Employer profile — 1973-10-03 to 1977-05-10

BIBB CO COLOSEUM PLANT

Federal OSHA safety record across 3 records in GA.

At a glance

Federal OSHA records for BIBB CO COLOSEUM PLANT include 0 Severe Injury Reports, 0 Form 300/301 injury filings, and 3 OSHA inspections, spanning GA, with incidents dated between 1973-10-03 and 1977-05-10. Aggregated from three OSHA data feeds; per-record detail and source citations are linked below.

Watch BIBB CO COLOSEUM PLANT — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for BIBB CO COLOSEUM PLANT is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.

By source

SIR0 records Injuries0 records Inspections3 records

Severe Injury Reports — 0

No Severe Injury Reports recorded for this employer.

ITA Form 300/301 Injury Reports — 0

No ITA Form 300/301 injury filings recorded for this employer.

OSHA Inspections — 3

Date range1973-10-03 to 1977-05-10

Most recent 3 of 3 inspections for this employer.

Macon, GA — 1977-05-10

BIBB CO COLOSEUM PLANT

TypeFollow-up DisciplineSafety Activity #14140040

Macon, GA — 1976-09-29

BIBB CO COLOSEUM PLANT

TypeFollow-up DisciplineHealth Activity #14139711

Macon, GA — 1973-10-03

BIBB CO COLOSEUM PLANT

TypePlanned DisciplineSafety Activity #14113583

Recent OSHA citations

No OSHA citations recorded for this employer.

Company facts

Name as filed with OSHA: BIBB CO COLOSEUM PLANT
States with records: GA

Addresses on OSHA filings

2 records: COLISEUM DRIVE, MACON, GA 31208
1 record: COLISEUM DRIVE, MACON, GA 31206

Locations on record

Macon, GA: 3 records

Industries (NAICS codes seen)

Sources

This profile aggregates federal OSHA records from three published feeds: OSHA Severe Injury Reports, the ITA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data (Form 300/301), and the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspections). Records are matched to this employer by normalized name; small variations in spelling, punctuation, and capitalization collapse to one profile, while materially different legal entities (e.g. parent vs. subsidiary with distinct hyphenated names) remain separate.