Employer profile — 1984-03-23 to 1985-04-16

CHICAGO BRIDGE AND IRON COMPANY

Federal OSHA safety record across 3 records in 3 states.

At a glance

Federal OSHA records for CHICAGO BRIDGE AND IRON COMPANY include 0 Severe Injury Reports, 0 Form 300/301 injury filings, and 3 OSHA inspections, spanning 3 states, with incidents dated between 1984-03-23 and 1985-04-16. Aggregated from three OSHA data feeds; per-record detail and source citations are linked below.

Watch CHICAGO BRIDGE AND IRON COMPANY — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for CHICAGO BRIDGE AND IRON COMPANY is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.

By source

SIR0 records Injuries0 records Inspections3 records

Severe Injury Reports — 0

No Severe Injury Reports recorded for this employer.

ITA Form 300/301 Injury Reports — 0

No ITA Form 300/301 injury filings recorded for this employer.

OSHA Inspections — 3

Date range1984-03-23 to 1985-04-16

Most recent 6 of 3 inspections for this employer.

NARROWS, VA — 2016-02-10 00:00:00

No OSHA citations recorded for this employer.

Company facts

Name as filed with OSHA: CHICAGO BRIDGE AND IRON COMPANY
States with records: KY, OH, TX

Addresses on OSHA filings

2 records: 2700 CHANNEL AVENUE, MEMPHIS, TN 38113
1 record: 271 WHITE RD, WILLOUGHBY HILLS, OH 44092
1 record: 3520 VIRGINIA AVENUE, NARROWS, VA 24124
1 record: IBM PROPERTY 740 NEW CIRCLE RD, LEXINGTON, KY 40505
1 record: KOCH REFINING CO SUNTIDE RD, CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78410

Locations on record

CORPUS CHRISTI, TX: 1 record
LEXINGTON, KY: 1 record
WILLOUGHBY HILLS, OH: 1 record

Industries (NAICS codes seen)

Sources

This profile aggregates federal OSHA records from three published feeds: OSHA Severe Injury Reports, the ITA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data (Form 300/301), and the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspections). Records are matched to this employer by normalized name; small variations in spelling, punctuation, and capitalization collapse to one profile, while materially different legal entities (e.g. parent vs. subsidiary with distinct hyphenated names) remain separate.