105,313Records 71,083Employers 85,290Hospitalizations 27,770Amputations 2015-01-01 2025-10-31
Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025

Employer profile — to

CHICAGO PNEUMATIC TOOL CO

Federal OSHA safety record across 16 records in 3 states.

At a glance

Federal OSHA records for CHICAGO PNEUMATIC TOOL CO include 0 Severe Injury Reports, 0 Form 300/301 injury filings, and 16 OSHA inspections, spanning 3 states, with incidents dated between and . Aggregated from three OSHA data feeds; per-record detail and source citations are linked below.

Watch CHICAGO PNEUMATIC TOOL CO — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for CHICAGO PNEUMATIC TOOL CO is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.

By source

SIR0 records Injuries0 records Inspections16 records

Severe Injury Reports — 0

No Severe Injury Reports recorded for this employer.

ITA Form 300/301 Injury Reports — 0

No ITA Form 300/301 injury filings recorded for this employer.

OSHA Inspections — 16

Date range to

Most recent 17 of 16 inspections for this employer.

Recent OSHA citations

No OSHA citations recorded for this employer.

Company facts

Name as filed with OSHA
CHICAGO PNEUMATIC TOOL CO
States with records
MA, NY, PA

Addresses on OSHA filings

8 records
HOWARD STREET, FRANKLIN, PA 16323
4 records
2200 BLEECKER STREET, UTICA, NY 13503
3 records
2200 BLEECKER ST, UTICA, NY 13503
1 record
300 EAST MULBERRY, SHERMAN, TX 75090
1 record
PRATTS JUNCTION ROAD, STERLING, MA 01564

Locations on record

Franklin, PA
8 records
Utica, NY
7 records
STERLING, MA
1 record

Industries (NAICS codes seen)

Sources

This profile aggregates federal OSHA records from three published feeds: OSHA Severe Injury Reports, the ITA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data (Form 300/301), and the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspections). Records are matched to this employer by normalized name; small variations in spelling, punctuation, and capitalization collapse to one profile, while materially different legal entities (e.g. parent vs. subsidiary with distinct hyphenated names) remain separate.