Employer profile — 1974-10-16 to 1978-11-28

FLOYD & HOBBS PAINTING CONTR

Federal OSHA safety record across 7 records in AL.

At a glance

Federal OSHA records for FLOYD & HOBBS PAINTING CONTR include 0 Severe Injury Reports, 0 Form 300/301 injury filings, and 7 OSHA inspections, spanning AL, with incidents dated between 1974-10-16 and 1978-11-28. Aggregated from three OSHA data feeds; per-record detail and source citations are linked below.

Watch FLOYD & HOBBS PAINTING CONTR — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for FLOYD & HOBBS PAINTING CONTR is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.

By source

SIR0 records Injuries0 records Inspections7 records

Severe Injury Reports — 0

No Severe Injury Reports recorded for this employer.

ITA Form 300/301 Injury Reports — 0

No ITA Form 300/301 injury filings recorded for this employer.

OSHA Inspections — 7

Date range1974-10-16 to 1978-11-28

Most recent 7 of 7 inspections for this employer.

Montgomery, AL — 1978-11-28

No OSHA citations recorded for this employer.

Company facts

Name as filed with OSHA: FLOYD & HOBBS PAINTING CONTR
States with records: AL

Addresses on OSHA filings

1 record: 64 N UNION, MONTGOMERY, AL 36104
1 record: 777 BUILDING SOUTH, MONTGOMERY, AL 36106
1 record: AUBURN UNIVERSITY MONTGOMERY C, MONTGOMERY, AL 36111
1 record: GUNTER INDUSTRIAL PARK, OPELIKA, AL 36104
1 record: HIGHWAY DEPT BUILDING, MONTGOMERY, AL 36103
1 record: HWY 731 AT HWY 9, WETUMPKA, AL 36104
1 record: STATE HIGHWAY DEPT BUILDING, MONTGOMERY, AL 36104

Locations on record

Montgomery, AL: 5 records
Opelika, AL: 1 record
Wetumpka, AL: 1 record

Industries (NAICS codes seen)

Sources

This profile aggregates federal OSHA records from three published feeds: OSHA Severe Injury Reports, the ITA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data (Form 300/301), and the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspections). Records are matched to this employer by normalized name; small variations in spelling, punctuation, and capitalization collapse to one profile, while materially different legal entities (e.g. parent vs. subsidiary with distinct hyphenated names) remain separate.