MADISON, SD —
OSHA Inspection: P.P.D., U.S.A., INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of P.P.D., U.S.A., INC. in 1810 THIRD STREET NE, MADISON, SD 57042 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 113332308.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- P.P.D., U.S.A., INC.
- Site address
- 1810 THIRD STREET NE
- City
- MADISON
- State
- SD
- ZIP
- 57042
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3089
- Employees
- 75
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
20 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $5000.00 · Current $2500.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazard of amputation: (a) On or before February 28, 1998, in the pill press area, the selector controls and the physical barrier guards for the #4 hydraulic pill press were not controlled or supervised by the employer. The press operators had control of the "key" which allowed them to open the plastic guard and enter the point-of-operation area. Also, the selector modes of operation were not controlled by management. American National Institute Standards (ANSI) B11.2-1982, paragraph 5.3.4.1 (3) states: "Barrier guards shall be fastened so that they are not readily removable by the operator and/or interlocked with the press control to prevent slide(s) motion if the guard is removed or opened." Abatement Note: Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct the hazard is to ensure that the barrier guards are not readily removable by the operator and the interlocks are all in proper working order and checked for proper operation at least at the start of every shift by management. Abatement Note: Abatement certification and documentation are required for this item (see enclosed "Sample Abatement Certification Letter").tion
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2500.00
- — Z (S) $5000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $5000.00 · Current $2500.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to a crushing hazard: (a) On or before February 28, 1998, in the pill press area, the descending safety gate on hydraulic pill press #4 descended with a pressure of approximately 82 pounds. American National Standards Institute (ANSI) B11.2-1982, paragraph 5.2.1 (4) states: "The following are considered to be similar to point-of-operation hazards: any other pinch point in or near the point-of-operation." Abatement Note: Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct the hazard is to ensure that the descending pressure on the safety gate does not exceed 5 pounds. Abatement Note: Abatement certification and documentation are required for this item (see enclosed "Sample Abatement Certification Letter").tion
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2500.00
- — Z (S) $5000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $5000.00 · Current $2500.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazard of amputation: (a) On or before February 28, 1998, the employer was utilizing hydraulic pill presses in their manufacturing process without implementing written instructions for all the hydraulic pill presses establishing guidelines for operation and care of the presses. American National Standards Institute (ANSI) B11.2-1982, paragraph 4.1.1 states: "It shall be the responsibility of the manufacturer to furnish written instructions with the hydraulic power press to establish guidelines for the operation and care of the press." Abatement Note: Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct the hazard is to ensure that up-to-date guidelines and operating instructions are written, published and accompany each hydraulic pill press used in the United States. Abatement Note: Abatement certification and documentation are required for this item (see enclosed "Sample Abatement Certification Letter").tion
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2500.00
- — Z (S) $5000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $5000.00 · Current $2500.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to amputation hazards: (a) On or before February 28, 1998, the employer was utilizing pill presses in their manufacturing process without the establishment of a program of periodic inspections of the hydraulic pill presses to ensure that all its parts, auxiliary equipment, and safeguards were in a safe operating condition and adjustment. There was no program of periodic inspections on #1, #4, and #5 hydraulic pill presses to ensure that the safety interlock mechanism was working and functioning properly. American National Standards Institute (ANSI) B11.2-1982, paragraph 4.3 states: "It shall be the responsibility of the employer to establish and follow a program of periodic inspections of his hydraulic power press to ensure that all its parts, auxiliary equipment, and safeguards are in a safe operating condition and adjustment." Abatement Note: Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct the hazard is to ensure that a "hands-on" inspection by company management be made of the operation and safeguards of each hydraulic pill press be made at least once per shift. Abatement Note: Abatement certification and documentation are required for this item (see enclosed "Sample Abatement Certification Letter").tion
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2500.00
- — Z (S) $5000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $5000.00 · Current $2500.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to amputation hazards: (a) On or before February 28, 1998, the employer did not adequately instruct and train the operators in the safe method of work before allowing the operation of the hydraulic pill presses in the facility. Press operators were using improper cleaning practices when reaching into the die area and cleaning out the dies with compressed air and operating the hydraulic pill presses without the use of all guards in place. American National Standards Institute (ANSI) B11.2-1982, paragraph 7.1 states: "The employer shall instruct and adequately train the operators in the safe method of work before allowing operation of any hydraulic power press covered by this standard. The employer shall ensure by adequate supervision that correct operating procedures are being followed." Abatement Note: Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct the hazard is to ensure that each and every press operator is adequately trained over every aspect of the operation of these hydraulic presses including the review of all manuals and written materials. Abatement Note: Abatement certification and documentation are required for this item (see enclosed "Sample Abatement Certification Letter").tion
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2500.00
- — Z (S) $5000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $5000.00 · Current $2500.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to amputation hazards: (a) On or before February 28, 1998, the #4 hydraulic pill press, located in the pill press area, did not have an adequate stop button in that the stop button located in the front of the press next to the start button had been disconnected and the stop button on the control panel could not be activated in an emergency in that the plastic door covered access to the button when the side guard of the press was open. American National Standards Institute (ANSI) B11.2-1982, paragraph 3.4.1.1 states: "A means of stopping the motion of all press slide(s) shall be provided. Actuation of the stop control shall deactivate immediately all press controls. The stop control shall override any other control." Abatement Note: Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct the hazard is to replace the stop button on the front of the press. Abatement Note: Abatement certification and documentation are required for this item (see enclosed "Sample Abatement Certification Letter").tion
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2500.00
- — Z (S) $5000.00
1910.38 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2500.00 · Current $1250.00 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1250.00
- — Z (S) $2500.00
1910.134 B01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $5000.00 · Current $2500.00 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2500.00
- — Z (S) $5000.00
1910.134 B03
- Issued
- Abate by
1910.134 D02 II
- Issued
- Abate by
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $5000.00 · Current $2500.00 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2500.00
- — Z (S) $5000.00
1910.157 C01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $5000.00 · Current $2500.00 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2500.00
- — Z (S) $5000.00
1910.157 E02
- Issued
- Abate by
1910.157 G01
- Issued
- Abate by
1910.242 B
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2500.00 · Current $1250.00 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1250.00
- — Z (S) $2500.00
1910.244 B
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $5000.00 · Current $2500.00 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2500.00
- — Z (S) $5000.00
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $5000.00 · Current $2500.00 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2500.00
- — Z (S) $5000.00
1910.1200 H
- Issued
- Abate by
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $70000.00 · Current $35000.00 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (U) $35000.00
- — Z (W) $70000.00
1904.2 A
- Issued
- Abate by
More inspections at P.P.D., U.S.A., INC.
MADISON, SD—1999-04-29 00:00:00
P.P.D., U.S.A., INC.
MADISON, SD—1999-04-29 00:00:00
P.P.D., U.S.A., INC.
MADISON, SD—1995-08-16 00:00:00
P.P.D., U.S.A., INC.
MADISON, SD—1992-05-06 00:00:00
P.P.D., U.S.A., INC.
MADISON, SD—1991-01-08 00:00:00
P.P.D., U.S.A., INC.
View P.P.D., U.S.A., INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
SCHENECTADY, NY—2012-01-05 00:00:00
BRUCE D. BOWMAN
BILLINGS, MT—2005-01-25 00:00:00
KGC, INC.
ROCKAWAY, NJ—2002-12-31 00:00:00
ROCKAWAY BOROUGH DPW
FOREST CITY, NC—2002-12-31 00:00:00
HARRY BRICKEY DBA A. BRICKEY CEILING COMPANY
EDGERTON, KS—2002-12-31 00:00:00
SUDDEN BOND INDUSTRIES
More inspections in SD
CLEAR LAKE, SD—2026-07-15
AEROTEK
YANKTON, SD—2026-07-14
EEI ENTERPRISE, LLC
SIOUX FALLS, SD—2026-07-14
S&T CONSTRUCTION, LLC
SIOUX FALLS, SD—2026-07-14
SAENZ CONSTRUCTION, LLC DBA TOP NOTCH CONSTRUCTION
SIOUX FALLS, SD—2026-07-13
H & R ROOFING OF SOUTH DAKOTA, INC.
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 113332308.