SEARCY, AR —
OSHA Inspection: MAYTAG SLP
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MAYTAG SLP in 200 QUEENSWAY, SEARCY, AR 72143 (NAICS 335224). OSHA activity number 308521319.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MAYTAG SLP
- Site address
- 200 QUEENSWAY
- City
- SEARCY
- State
- AR
- ZIP
- 72143
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 335224
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3633
- Employees
- 599
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4500.00 · Current $4500.00
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $4500.00
- — Z (S) $4500.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $63000.00 · Current $63000.00
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to point of operation hazards where: a) The Verson U05 mechanical press brake was not equipped with anti-repeat features as required by The American National Standards Institute (ANSI) industry standard B11.3, 1982 edition, section 3.1; b) The Verson U05 mechanical press brake was not equipped with two-hand controls requiring concurrent pressure as required by ANSI B11.3, section 3.6; c) There were no inspection records conducted nor inspection record verification maintained for the Verson U05 mechanical press brake as required by ANSI B11.3, section 5.1.4; d) Operator training was not provided for employees operating the Verson U05 mechanical press brake as required by ANSI B11.3, section 6.1.2 Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to ensure the press brake is equipped with anti-repeat and concurrent pressure features incorporated into the machine's two-hand controls; to ensure inspections of the press brake are conducted and documented; and ensure operators are adequately trained to include operation of the press brake without placing hands in the die of the press brake.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $63000.00
- — Z (W) $63000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $63000.00 · Current $7000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to point of operation hazards where: The Verson U05 mechanical power press brake did not incorporate an anti-repeat feature and other safe guarding methods to prevent unintended strokes as the employer misinterpreted the applicability of ANSI requirements.
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $7000.00
- — Z (W) $63000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $63000.00 · Current $7000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to point of operation hazards where: The employer failed to maintain complete inspection records for the Verson U05 mechanical power press brake.
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $7000.00
- — Z (W) $63000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $63000.00 · Current $7000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to point of operation hazards where: The employer failed to maintain complete maintenance records for the Verson U05 mechanical power press brake.
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $7000.00
- — Z (W) $63000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $63000.00 · Current $7000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to point of operation hazards where: The employer failed to provide employees who operate the Verson U05 mechanical power press brake with additional training beyond initial operator training and retraining before the employees were first assigned duties on the press brake and annually thereafter.
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $7000.00
- — Z (W) $63000.00
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 335224)
CLARKSVILLE, TN—2020-07-28 00:00:00
LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC.
NEWBERRY, SC—2020-06-22 00:00:00
74533 - SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS HOME APPLIANCE AMERICA LLC
NEWBERRY, SC—2019-11-04 00:00:00
74286 - SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS HOME APPLIANCE AMERICA LLC
NEWBERRY, SC—2019-07-02 00:00:00
74116 - SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS HOME APPLIANCE AMERICA LLC
CLARKSVILLE, TN—2019-04-30 00:00:00
LG ELECTRONICS USA INC
More inspections in AR
SILOAM SPRINGS, AR—2026-07-15
CR CRAWFORD CONSTRUCTION LLC
VAN BUREN, AR—2026-07-14
MILLAR PARTNERS, LLC
BRINKLEY, AR—2026-07-14
ROGER WILKISON FARMS PARTNERSHIP
SEARCY, AR—2026-07-14
MASTER?S PLASTERING & MORE INC
LITTLE ROCK, AR—2026-07-09
NABHOLZ CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 308521319.