Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS in 25 FIELDS POINT DR, PROVIDENCE, RI 02905 (NAICS 424710). OSHA activity number 314916503.

Watch Enterprise Products — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Enterprise Products is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS
Site address
25 FIELDS POINT DR
City
PROVIDENCE
State
RI
ZIP
02905
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
424710
SIC code (legacy)
5171
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.119 D03 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $7000.00 · Current $7000.00
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii):  The employer did not document that the
equipment in the process
complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices:
(a) Facility: The employer did not have a program in place for the control
of stop valves
provided upstream or downstream of the Pressure Relief devices to prevent
unauthorized valve
operation, such as but not limited to ASME BPVC UG-135 and appendix M, on
or about 4-14-
11.4-
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7000.00
  • — Z (S) $7000.00

1910.119 E05

Other-than-serious Gravity 10 3 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $7000.00
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(5): The employer did not establish a system to assure
that the process
hazard analysis team's recommendations are resolved in a timely manner and
that the resolution
is documented:
(a) Marcaptin storage tank area: The employer did not assure that the
process hazard analysis
team's recommendation to change drawing 2V of the mercaptin tank to remove
the stack and
replace it with an 18 inch manway, with a due date of 8-30-09, was
resolved in a timely
manner, on or about 3-8-11.
(b) Generator room: The employer did not assure that the process hazard
analysis team's
recommendation to replace generator G-1, with a due date of 12-31-09, was
resolved in a timely
manner, on or about 3-8-11.
(c) Dock area: The employer did not assure that the 2004 recommendation of
replacing the
piping to pit number 5 with stainless steel pipe had been adequately
documented as to why the
pipe was not replaced with stainless steel pipe, as per the process hazard
analysis team's
recommendation, on or about 3-8-11.ndation,
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (S) $7000.00

1910.119 J04 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $7000.00 · Current $7000.00
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(i):  Inspections and tests were not performed on
process equipment to
maintain its mechanical integrity:
(a) Inside diked area, Tank T-1: The employer did not perform any
inspections and tests, such
as but not limited to thickness measurement testing, on the rusted double
flange tee fitting under
Pressure Relief valve 21C to ensure that its mechanical integrity was
maintained, on or about
3-8-11.
(b) Tank V-1 receiver: The employer did not perform any internal or
on-stream inspections and
tests, such as but not limited to API 510, on the tank V-1 receiver to
ensure that its mechanical
integrity was maintained, on or about 3-8-11.
(c) Tank V-12 fuel storage tank: The employer did not perform any internal
or on-stream
inspections and tests, such as but not limited to API 510, on the tank
V-12 fuel storage tank to
ensure that its mechanical integrity was maintained, on or about
3-8-11.ned,
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7000.00
  • — Z (S) $7000.00

1910.119 D02 IA

Deleted Other-than-serious Gravity 01 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(2)(i)(A):  Process safety information pertaining to the
technology of the
process did not include a block flow diagram or simplified process flow
diagram:
(a) Mercaptin storage tank area: The employer's Process safety information
pertaining to the
technology of the process did not include an accurate and updated process
flow diagram for the
mercaptin storage tank, on or about 4-14-11.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (O)

1910.119 D03 IB

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(B):  Process safety information pertaining to the
equipment
in the
process did not include the piping and instrument diagrams (P&ID'S):
(a) Mercaptin storage tank area: The employer's Process safety information
pertaining to the
equipment in the process did not include an accurate and updated piping
and instrument diagram
(P & ID) )for the mercaptin storage tank, on or about 4-14-11.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (O)

1910.119 O03

Deleted Other-than-serious Gravity 01 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
29 CFR 1910.119(o)(3):  A report was not developed of the findings of the
compliance audit
required by 29 CFR 1910.119(o)(1):
(a) Facility: The employer's report of the findings of the compliance
audit required by
1910.119(o)(1) did not accurately reflect the mercaptin tank replacement
performed in 2006, in
that it still referred to the previous tank arrangement prior to the 2006
replacement, on or about
5-10-11.ent,
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (O)

View ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 314916503.