TILTON, NH —
OSHA Inspection: JOSE MARIA ACERO-CHUMA
Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of JOSE MARIA ACERO-CHUMA in 120 LACONIA ROAD, TILTON, NH 03276 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 330292400.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JOSE MARIA ACERO-CHUMA
- Site address
- 120 LACONIA ROAD
- City
- TILTON
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03276
- Mailing
- 140 FIRST STREET, LOWELL, MA 01850
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Related (G)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 F07
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3000.00 · Current $1500.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration: a. Site- Employees were exposed to fall hazards where ladder jack scaffolding was not erected by a competent person.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500
- — Z (S) $3000
1926.452 K05
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(k)(5): Scaffold platforms were bridged one to another. a. Site- Employees were exposed to scaffold collapse hazards where ladder jack scaffolding utilized scaffold platforms bridged over the same ladder.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3000.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: a. Site- Employees wearing personal fall arrest systems were not provided with fall protection training from the employer.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3000
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $4200.00 · Current $2100.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level was not protected from falling to that lower level. a. Site- Employees working from ladder jack scaffolding were exposed to a fall of approximately 18 feet were fall protection was not used.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $4200
1926.501 B10
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and fuardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system. (a)(LOCATION)(IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)(DESCRIBE HAZARD(S) WHERE NECESSARY) a. Roof- Employees working from a flat roof where materials and equipment were stored were exposed to a fall of approximately 18 feet where fall protection was not used.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B11
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: a. Roof- Employees working from the roof were exposed to a fall of approximately 18 feet were fall protection was not used.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B09
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3000.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(9): The area around the top and/or bottom of (a) ladder(s) was not kept clear: a. Scaffold- Employees accessing ladder jack scaffolding were exposed to a fall while climbing up and over the scaffold platform where the top of the ladder was not kept clear.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3000
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
FAIRVIEW, TN—2026-07-16
MARVIN PINERA
CARSON CITY, NV—2026-07-16
UNKNOWN/INVALID ESTABLISHMENT
BANNOCKBURN, IL—2026-07-16
ROOFING H.P. LLC
LOXLEY, AL—2026-07-16
CARLOS CHE
BALTIMORE, MD—2026-07-16
VAL CONSTRUCTION INC
More inspections in NH
PORTSMOUTH, NH—2026-07-15
RODAS CONSTRUCTION CORP
DOVER, NH—2026-07-15
KNOX MARSH DEVELOPMENT LLC
DOVER, NH—2026-07-15
REAL PRO BUILDERS CONSTRUCTION INC
MERRIMACK, NH—2026-07-15
BURGER KING
MILFORD, NH—2026-07-15
R G EXTERIORS, INC.
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 330292400.