MONTROSE, CO —
OSHA Inspection: DH STUCCO
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DH STUCCO in 1760 E TOWNSEND, MONTROSE, CO 81401 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 330774290.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DH STUCCO
- Site address
- 1760 E TOWNSEND
- City
- MONTROSE
- State
- CO
- ZIP
- 81401
- Mailing
- 67971 COLINA DRIVE, MONTROSE, CO 81401
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4200.00 · Current $2100.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii): On or about July 6, 2011, and at times prior, employees were exposed to fall hazards in excess of 10 feet when working on a scaffold platform that was not fully planked. A single plank was used bewtween scaffold levels.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $4200
1926.451 C02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3000.00 · Current $1500.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, or uprights did not bear on base plates, mud sills or other adequate firm foundation: a) On or about July 6, 2011, employees were exposed to fall hazards where the scaffold did not have base plates on three of the inner legs and one outer leg.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500
- — Z (S) $3000
1926.451 F07
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration: a) On or about July 6, 2011, and at times prior, employees were exposed to fall hazards where the scaffold they were working on was not erected under the supervision of a competent person.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.452 C02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(c)(2): Frames and panels were not braced by cross, horizontal, or diagonal braces, or combination thereof, which would secure vertical members together laterally: a) On or about July 6, 2011, and at times prior, employees were exposed to fall hazards where the scaffold was not completely cross braced.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.454 B
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(b): The employer did not have each employee involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in question: a) On or about July 6, 2011, and at times prior, employees erecting and maintaining the scaffold they were working on had not been trained in scaffold erection or to recognize the hazards associated with working on a scaffold.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2400.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used: a) On or about July 6, 2011, and at times prior, employees were expsosed to fall hazards where a ladder was not provided as a means of access to the woking level of the scaffold.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2400
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4200.00 · Current $2100.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level was not protected from falling to that lower level: a) On or about July 6, 2011 and at times prior, employees were exposed to fall hazards in excess of 10 feet while working on a scaffold with no guardrails or any other means of fall protection in place.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $4200
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
RENO, NV—2026-07-16
DC MASONRY
WINNETKA, IL—2026-07-15
CHICAGO STUCCO CO.
LODI, NJ—2026-07-15
J & O MASONRY CONTRACTORS
DORAVILLE, GA—2026-07-14
SUDLOW CONCRETE, INC.
FLAGLER BEACH, FL—2026-07-14
PLANET DESIGN SERVICES, INC.
More inspections in CO
BROOMFIELD, CO—2026-07-16
WAVELYNX TECHNOLOGIES LLC
COLORADO SPRINGS, CO—2026-07-15
ELMER CONTRACTOR LLC
SHERIDAN, CO—2026-07-15
JOHN'S COLLISION REPAIR, INC.
CENTENNIAL, CO—2026-07-15
BRAKES PLUS, INC
ENGLEWOOD, CO—2026-07-15
PCL CIVIL CONSTRUCTORS INC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 330774290.