BELLBROOK, OH —
OSHA Inspection: SANTO GONZALEZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SANTO GONZALEZ in 4483 LIECESTER, BELLBROOK, OH 45305 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 330973066.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SANTO GONZALEZ
- Site address
- 4483 LIECESTER
- City
- BELLBROOK
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 45305
- Mailing
- 903 MCPERSON, CINCINNATI, OH 45205
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $3000.00 · Current $3000.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s) The employer did not ensure that frequent and regular inspections were conducted in that employees were exposed to falls in excess of 18 feet and an unguarded belt and pulley.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3000
- — Z (S) $3000
1926.300 B01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $4200.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.300(b)(1): Power operated tool(s), designed to accommodate guards, were not equipped with such guards when in use: Employees were utilizing a Titan Industrial gas air compressor while engaged in a residential roofing operation and exposed to amputation hazards in that the belt and pulley guard was missing.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4200
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $4200.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph (b) Note: If using these systems was infeasible or created a greater hazard, the employer should develop and implement a fall protection plan meeting the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Employees were engaged in a residential roofing operation and exposed to a fall hazard in excess of 18 feet while not utilizing any type of fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4200
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
SIOUX FALLS, SD—2026-07-13
H & R ROOFING OF SOUTH DAKOTA, INC.
HENDERSON, NV—2026-07-13
INTEGRITY ROOFING LLC
CORTLANDT MANOR, NY—2026-07-13
LG BUILDERS INC.
CAMDEN, OH—2026-07-13
ALBERTO MORALES
BLOOMINGTON, IL—2026-07-13
UNKNOWN CONTRACTOR
More inspections in OH
OXFORD, OH—2026-07-13
R&R SIDING LLC
CONNEAUT, OH—2026-07-13
CONTINENTAL STRUCTURAL PLASTICS
CAMDEN, OH—2026-07-13
ALBERTO MORALES
HARRISON, OH—2026-07-10
WEBER FAMILY FARMS LLC
JEFFERSON, OH—2026-07-10
LAKE CITY PLATING LLC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 330973066.