Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: ENVISION UNLIMITED

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ENVISION UNLIMITED in 17728 S. CAMPBELL, CHICAGO, IL 60643 (NAICS 623210). OSHA activity number 331078881.

Watch Envision Unlimited — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Envision Unlimited is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ENVISION UNLIMITED
Site address
17728 S. CAMPBELL
City
CHICAGO
State
IL
ZIP
60643
Mailing
8 S MICHIGAN, SUITE 1700, CHICAGO, IL 60603
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
623210
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1030 C01 II A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4500.00 · Current $2250.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(ii)(A):  The employer's Exposure Control Plan did not include the exposure determination required by 29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(2):    a) On or about October 13, 2011, at the above located workplace, where employees were exposed blood, the employer's Exposure Control Plan did not include an exposure determination which included:    i) A list of all job classifications in which all employees in those job classifications have occupational exposure without regard to the use of personal protective equipment;    ii) A list of job classifications in which some employees have occupational exposure without regard to the use of personal protective equipment;    iii) A list of all task and procedures or groups of closely related task and procedures in which occupational exposure occurs and that are performed by employees in job classifications listed in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 29 CFR 1910 (c)(2)(i)(B).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2250
  • — Z (S) $4500

1910.1030 C01 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(iv):   The Exposure Control Plan was not reviewed and updated at least annually and whenever necessary to reflect new or modified task and procedures which affect occupational exposure and reflect new or revised employee positions with occupational exposure. The review and update of such plan did not:    i) Reflect changes in technology that eliminate or reduce exposure to bloodborne pathogens; and    ii) Document annually considerations and implementations of appropriate commercially available and effective safer medical devices designed to eliminate or minimize occupational exposure:    a) On or about October 13, 2011, at the above located workplace, where an employee experienced a sharps injury, the workplace bloodborne pathogen exposure control program had not been reviewed since 2005.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1030 D02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(2)(i): Engineering and work practice controls were not used to eliminate or minimize employee exposure:    a) On or about October 13, 2011, at the above located worksite, employees used lancets to check draw blood and determine glucose levels. The lancets did not have engineered sharps injury protection, and placed the employees at an increased risk of needle sticks injuries. Effective and appropriate sharps with engineered sharps injury protection were commercially available. Employees using the devices without engineered sharps injury protection were therefore exposed to the hazard of blood borne disease.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1030 F01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4500.00 · Current $2250.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(1)(ii):  The employer did not ensure that all medical evaluations and procedures including  the Hepatitis B vaccine and vaccination series and post-exposure evaluation and follow-up, were provided as required by 1910.1030 (f)(1)(ii)(A) through 1910.1030 (f)(1)(ii)(D):    a) Between approximately May 13, 2011 and October 13, 2011, at the above located worksite the employer did not offer a totally free Hepatitis B vaccination series. The employer required employees that did not complete the three shot series to pay for shots they received.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2250
  • — Z (S) $4500

1910.1030 F02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(2)(i):  Hepatitis B vaccination was not made available after the employee had received the training required in 29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(vii)(I) or within 10 working days of initial assignment to employees who had occupational exposure to blood or other potentially infectious materials:    a) Between approximately May 13, 2011 and October 13, 2011, at the above located worksite all new employees having occupational exposure to blood or other potentially infectious materials were not offered the HBV series after training by a person knowledgeable in the subject matter and within the first ten working days of initial assignment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1030 F03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(3):  Following a report of an exposure incident, the employer did not make immediately available to the exposed employee a medical evaluation and follow-up as specified by this paragraph (f).    a) On or about October 2, 2011, at the above located workplace an employee experienced a sharps injury. The employer did not make available an immediate medical evaluation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1030 F03 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(3)(i):  The postexposure evaluation and followup of an exposure incident did not include documentation of the route(s) of exposure or the circumstances under which the exposure incident occurred:    a) On or about October 2, 2011, at the above located workplace an employee experienced and reported an exposure incident (sharps injury). The employer's post exposure investigation did not include sufficient documentation concerning the circumstances surrounding the exposure incident. The investigation did not include:   a) Protective equipment or clothing that was used at the time of the exposure incident  b) Location and procedure being performed when the incident occurred,   c) Description of the device in use (including brand and type), and  d) The employee's training:
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1030 F03 II A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(3)(ii)(A):  Following a report of an exposure incident the source individuals blood was not tested as soon as feasible and after consent is obtained in order to determine HBV and HIV infectivity:    a) On or about October 2, 2011, at the above located workplace an employee experienced a sharps injury. The employer did not test the source individuals blood as soon as feasible.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1030 H01 II B

Other-than-serious 7 instances 14 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1030(h)(1)(ii)(B): The medical record for an employee with occupational exposure did not include a copy of the employees hepatitis B vaccination status including the dates of all hepatitis B vaccinations and any medical records relative to the employees ability to receive vaccination as required by  29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(2):    a) On or about October 20, 2011, at the above located workplace, the employer did not maintain the hepatitis B vaccine declination statement for the three (out of a total of four) nurses that that had exposure and declined the hepatitis B vaccination.    b) On or about October 20, 2011, at the above located workplace, the employer did not maintain the hepatitis B vaccine declination statement for the two (out of a total of five) support staff employees that had exposure and declined the hepatitis B vaccination
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

SEVITA

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331078881.