Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: WILCOX CONSTRUCTION, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of WILCOX CONSTRUCTION, LLC in SAVANNAH WAY, MADISON, WI 53711 (NAICS 236115). OSHA activity number 331085365.

Watch Wilcox Construction, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Wilcox Construction, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
SAVANNAH WAY
City
MADISON
State
WI
ZIP
53711
Mailing
605 WILSON AVE., EDGERTON, WI 53534
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236115
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3600.00 · Current $1800.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1):     Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present could cause potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.                Employees were not provided with safety glassess while using a pneumatic nail gun to install shingles on a roof.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1800
  • — Z (S) $3600

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4200.00 · Current $2100.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):     "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet(1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.        Employees were not protected from falling to lower levels while installing shingles on a residential roof.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $4200

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4200.00 · Current $2100.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):     Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder were not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, were not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder.  In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.            Employees were using a portable ladder to access the upper landing of the roof, of which, the ladder did not extend 3 feet above the upper landing surface.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $4200

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331085365.