Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
3,913,242Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION in CHRISTOPHER WAY OFF FOWLER, BOZEMAN, MT 59715 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 331101675.

Watch Robinson Construction — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Robinson Construction is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
CHRISTOPHER WAY OFF FOWLER
City
BOZEMAN
State
MT
ZIP
59715
Mailing
28 INDIAN PAINT BRUSH, BOZEMAN, MT 59718
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4200.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):     The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. The program did not enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and did not train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1000
  • — C (S) $4200
  • — Z (S) $4200

1926.501 B13

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $8400.00 · Current $4000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):     "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer did not develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (R) $4000
  • — C (R) $8400
  • — Z (R) $8400

View ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331101675.