Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: DNR CONSTRUCTION CO.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DNR CONSTRUCTION CO. in 92 JOHANN DR., COLLINSVILLE, IL 62234 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 333324051.

Watch DNR Construction CO. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for DNR Construction CO. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
92 JOHANN DR.
City
COLLINSVILLE
State
IL
ZIP
62234
Mailing
803 PENNSYLVANIA, COLLINSVILLE, IL 62234
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1):     The employer did not initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part.    Employees working from a six in twelve pitch roof were exposed to falls of approximately 19 feet to a lower level. The employer did not initiate and maintain an accident prevention program to control and eliminate the hazards present at the jobsite in accordance with the OSHA regulations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.20 B02

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2):     The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s)    Employees working from an six in twelve pitch roof was exposed to falls of approximately 18 feet to a lower level. The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.102 A01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1):     Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.  (a)Employees using a pneumatic nail gun are exposed hazards which could result in a corneal abrasions.    Employees installing shingles with a pneumatic nail gun was not wearing any type of eye protection. The employer failed to provide his employees with eye protection while using a pneumatic nail gun.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.501 B13

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):     Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph (b)  Note:  If using these systems was infeasible or created a greater hazard, the employer should develop and implement a fall protection plan meeting the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.    Employees were engaged in roofing activities working from an six in twelve pitch roof, employee was exposed to falls of approximately 18 feet from the ground to the eave. Employees were not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or a personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.503 A01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):     The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:    Employees working from an eight in twelve pitch roof were exposed to falls of approximately 19 feet to a lower level. The employer did not provide training to his employees who might be exposed to fall hazards
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):     Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:    An extension ladder to access work on the roof didnt extend three feet above the upper landing surface nor were there any grasping device, such as a grab rail to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.1060 A

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1060(a):     The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, that enabled each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways, and that trained each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize those hazards:    An extension ladder used to access work on the roof didnt extend three feet above the upper landing surface nor were there any grasping device, such as a grab rail to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. The employer failed to provide training to employees in ladder usage and to be able to recognize hazards related to ladders.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B15

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(15):     Ladders were not inspected by a competent person for visible defects on a periodic basis and after an occurrence that could affect their safe use:    An extension ladder set up on the north side of the complex used to access work on the roof was damaged, there were cracks in the fiberglass. The employer failed to ensure ladders were being inspected by a competent person for visible defects on a periodic basis and after any occurrence that could affect their safe use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1053 B16

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(16):     Portable ladder(s) with structural defects, such as, but not limited to, broken or missing rungs, cleats, or steps, broken or split rails, corroded components, or other faulty or defective components, were not either immediately    Employee are exposed to possibly falls due to ladder failure. An extension ladder set up on the north side of the complex used to access work on the roof had a damaged rail, there were cracks in the fiberglass.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 333324051.