Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: JUAN ALEJANDRO ALVAREZ

Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of JUAN ALEJANDRO ALVAREZ in 517 NORTH DOWNING RD, ANGLETON, TX 77515 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 333960227.

Watch Juan Alejandro Alvarez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Juan Alejandro Alvarez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
517 NORTH DOWNING RD
City
ANGLETON
State
TX
ZIP
77515
Mailing
58 PERIWINKLE CT, LAKE JACKSON, TX 77566
Inspection type
Federal Agency (M)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.502 D08

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(8):  Horizontal lifelines were not designed, installed, and used under the supervision of a qualified person, as part of a complete personal fall arrest system, which maintained a safety factor of at least two:    a)  At the facility, on the roof: On April 19, 2012 the employer did not ensure the horizontal lifeline used by employees and tied to a roof vent was designed, installed and used under supervision of a qualified person or had a safety factor of at least two for all employees attached to it.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.502 D16 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(16)(iii):  Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, were not rigged such that an employee could not free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m) nor contact any lower level:    a)  At the facility, on the roof:  On April 19, 2012 the employer provided employees a fall protection system consisting of lanyard and rope connected to a horizontal lifeline located on the roof centerline approximately 30 feet from the edge, exposing employees to a free fall in excess of 6 feet in the event of a fall through a roof opening.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.754 E02 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
29 CFR 1926.754(e)(2)(ii):  The employer did not deck over roof and floor holes and openings.      a)  At the facility on the roof:  On April 19, 2012 the employer did not deck over roof openings exposing employees to a fall hazard of approximately 22 feet above the lower level.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.760 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
29 CFR 1926.760(a)(1):   Each employee engaged in a steel erection activity who is on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge more than 15 feet (4.6 m) above a lower level was not protected from fall hazards by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, positioning device systems, or fall restraint systems.    a) At the facility on the roof:  On April 19, 2012 the employer did not ensure each employee on a roof with unprotected edges and openings to lower levels in excess of 15 feet was protected from fall hazards by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, positioning device systems or fall restraint systems.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):   Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:    a)  At the facility, at the front of the building: On April 19, 2012 the employer did not ensure the rails of the extension ladder used to access the roof extended at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface, exposing employees to a fall hazard of approximately 21 feet above the lower level.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 333960227.