PERRYSBURG, OH —
OSHA Inspection: MASTER CHEMICAL CORPORATION
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of MASTER CHEMICAL CORPORATION in 501 WEST BOUDARY, PERRYSBURG, OH 43551 (NAICS 324191). OSHA activity number 334244506.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MASTER CHEMICAL CORPORATION
- Site address
- 501 WEST BOUDARY
- City
- PERRYSBURG
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 43551
- Mailing
- 501 WEST BOUDARY, PERRYSBURG, OH 43551
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 324191
- Employees
- 65
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.332 B01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3500.00 · Current $3500.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.332(b)(1) Employees were not trained in and familiar with the safety-related work practices required by 1910.33 through 1910.335 that pertain to their respective job assignments: (a) Master Chemical: On or about May 3, 2012, the employer did not ensure that maintenance personnel performing work on an energized or potentially energized 440 volts AC 3-phase circuit providing power to the pump in the C tank were familiar with or trained on how to protect themselves from electric shock, arc-flash, and arc-blast hazards from energized electrical parts and equipment. Personnel were not aware of safe approach distances, were not aware of the need for electrical personal protective equipment (PPE), and were not knowledgeable in the selection of proper PPE to protect from electric shock, arc flash, and arc explosion.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3500
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.333 A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3500.00 · Current $1225.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.333(a): Safety related work practices were not employed to prevent electrical shock or other injuries resulting from either direct or indirect contacts, when work was performed near or on equipment or circuits which were or could be energized: (a) Master Chemical: On or about May 3, 2012, and on a continuing basis, the employer did not ensure that maintenance personnel working on 480 volts, 3-phase circuits followed safe work practices. Maintenance personnel were not aware of safe approach distances, did not utilize properly rated insulated tools, and were not aware of the need for electrical personal protective equipment. Employee used a Fluke model 21 multimeter to troubleshoot a pump on C tank.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1225
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.335 A01 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3500.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that employees working in areas where there are potential electrical hazards were provided with, and use, electrical protective equipment that is appropriate for the specific parts of the body to be protected and for the work to be performed. (a) Master Chemical: On or about May 3, 2012, the employer did not ensure that maintenance personnel performing work on an energized or potentially energized 480 volts AC 3-phase circuit for the pump in C tank used arc flash and electrocution protection, such as but not limited to, arc rated clothing and voltage rated protective gloves. It was an on-going practice for maintenance personnel to check the voltage on energized and potentially energized circuits with a Fluke model 21 multimeter.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.335 A01 V
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(v): Employees did not wear protective equipment for the eyes or face wherever there was danger of injury to the eyes or face from electric arcs or flashes or from flying objects resulting from electrical explosion: (a) Master Chemical: On or about May 3, 2012, the employer did not ensure that maintenance personnel performing work on an energized or potentially energized 440 volts AC 3-phase circuit providing power to the pump for tank C used arc flash and electrocution protection, such as but not limited to, an arc rated face shield.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at MASTER CHEMICAL CORPORATION
SHELBYVILLE, IN—1987-07-06 00:00:00
MASTER CHEMICAL CORPORATION
View MASTER CHEMICAL CORPORATION's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 324191)
TULSA, OK—2026-05-12
HF SINCLAIR TULSA REFINING, LLC
CHALMETTE, LA—2026-05-09
PBF ENERGY
CHANNELVIEW, TX—2026-05-06
VALVOLINE GLOBAL OPERATIONS
MIDDLETOWN, OH—2026-04-24
QUAKER HOUGHTON PA, INC.
SOUTH GATE, CA—2026-03-05
DEMENNO-KERDOON
More inspections in OH
WELLINGTON, OH—2026-07-16
WHIRLAWAY CORPORATION
WAUSEON, OH—2026-07-16
WATSON WELL DRILLING INC.
SEVEN HILLS, OH—2026-07-15
STONEY ACRES BUILDERS LLC
SEVEN HILLS, OH—2026-07-15
GRB ENTERPRISES LLC
CHILLICOTHE, OH—2026-07-15
KENWORTH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334244506.