Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: GROWTH PRODUCTS LTD.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of GROWTH PRODUCTS LTD. in 74 WESTMORELAND AVENUE, WHITE PLAINS, NY 10606 (NAICS 325311). OSHA activity number 334471935.

Watch Growth Products LTD. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Growth Products LTD. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
74 WESTMORELAND AVENUE
City
WHITE PLAINS
State
NY
ZIP
10606
Mailing
80 LAFAYETTE AVENUE WHITE PLAINS, WHITE PLAINS, NY 10603
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
325311
Employees
14
Ownership type
A

13 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm in that employees mixing chemicals and others working in the area of the mixing tank were exposed to from the hazard of being struck by portions of the tank, uncontrolled release of hazardous chemicals and/or exposure to hot water due to tank failure:    a)  Mixing Tank/Reactor Vessel:  The employees mixing chemicals and others working in the area of the mixing tank/reactor vessel were exposed to hazards associated with tank failure resulting from the use of a mixing reactor that had a deformation and cracking of its shell; on or about 6/13/12.        In addition to abatement certification, the employer is required to submit abatement documentation for this item, failure to comply will result in additional penalty of $ 1,000.00 as per 29 CFR 1903.19
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.146 C01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(1):  The employer did not evaluate the workplace to determine if any spaces were permit-required confined spaces:    a)  Large Production Mixing Tank:  Employees performed confined space entry into this tank and the empoyer did not evaluate the workplace to determine if the tank was a permit-required confined space; on or about 4/13/12.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.146 C02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(2): The employer did not inform exposed employees, by posting danger signs or by any other equally effective means, of the existence and location of and the danger posed by the permit spaces:    a) Large Production Mixing Tank:  Employees performed confined space entry into this tank and the empoyer did not inform employees of the existence and location of and the danger posed by the permit spaces; on or about 4/13/12:
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.146 C04

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4):  When the employer decided that its employees would enter permit spaces, the employer did not develop and implement a written permit space entry program that complied with 29 CFR 1910.146:    a) Large Production Mixing Tank:  Employees performed confined space entry into this tank and the empoyer did not develop and implement a written permit space entry program;  on or about 4/13/12:
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.146 E01

Deleted Serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.146(e)(1):  Before entry was authorized, the employer did not document the completion of measures required by 29 CFR 1910.146(d)(3) by preparing an entry permit:    a) Large Production Mixing Tank:  Employees performed confined space entry into this tank and the employer did not document completion of measures required by 29 CFR 1910.146(d)(3) by preparing an entry permit; on or about  4/13/12:      Note:  Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.146 presents examples of permits whose elements are considered to comply with these requirements.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.146 D05 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(d)(5)(i):  Pre-entry testing was not performed to the extent feasible before entry was authorized into a permit space:    a) Large Production Mixing Tank:  Employees performed confined space entry into this tank and the employer did not test the internal atmosphere prior to entry; on or about 4/13/12:
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.146 G01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(g)(1):  The employer did not provide training so that all employees whose work was regulated by 29 CFR 1910.146 (permit required confined spaces) acquired the understanding, knowledge, and skills necessary for the safe performance of the duties assigned under 29 CFR 1910.146:    a) Large Production Mixing Tank:  Employees performed confined space entry into this tank and the employer did not provide training as required by the standard; on or about  4/13/12:
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.146 K03

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(k)(3):  Retrieval systems or methods were not used to facilitated non-entry whenever an authorized entrant entered a permit space:    a) Large Production Mixing Tank:  Employees performed confined space entry into this tank and the employer did not have a retrieval system or other methods in place to facilitate non-entry rescue; on or about 4/13/12:
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.242 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1910.242(b):  Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.:    a)  Warehouse:  Employees used compressed air at 70 p.s.i. to clean dust off of forklift trucks; on or about 5/24/12.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.178 Q01

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 14 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(1):  Any power-operated industrial truck not in safe operating condition was not taken out of service, and/or repairs were not made by authorized personnel:    a) Inside/Outsdie of Facility:  The green Komatsu 25 forklift with two flat tires, an inoperable backup alarm and an unsecured propane cylinder was not taken out of service and/or repaired; on or about 5/24/12.    b) Inside the Facility:   The blue/gray Komatsu forklift had no seatbelt, rear tires with insufficient tread, an inoperable back up alarm, and an inoperable horn was not taken out of service and/or repaired; on or about 5/24/12.    c) Inside the Facility:  The Komatsu 20 had an inoperable back up alarm and was not taken out of service and/or repaired; on or about 5/24/12.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.1200 G02 II

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 14 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $1600.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(2)(ii):  The chemical manufacturer preparing the safety data sheet did not ensure it included information in Section 2, Hazard identification    a)  Entire Facility:  The material safety data sheet for PH Reducer ( 50% Citric Acid) - Section 2 did not identify the hazardous ingredient (e.g., citric acid) was in the product; on or about 8/22/12.    b) Entire Facility:  The material safety data sheet for Liquid Phosphorous 0-30-0 - Section 2 did not specify the occupational exposure limits for phosphoric acid; on or about 8/22/12.    c) Entire Facility:  The material safety data sheet for Iron Max AC 6% 15-0-0 did not identify the hazardous ingredient (e.g., citric acid) was in the product; on or about 8/22/12.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1600
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.1200 G05

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 14 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(5):  The chemical manufacturer, importer or employer did not ensure that the information provided accurately reflects the scientific evidence used in making the hazard classification:    a)  Entire Facility:  The material safety data sheet for PH Reducer ( 50% Citric Acid) did not accurately reflect the scientific evidence  used in making the hazard classification in that inaccurate information was provided in Section 5 Health Hazard Information, Section 6 Emergency and First Aid Procedures and Section 8 Reactivity Data; on or about 8/22/12.    b) Entire Facility:  The material safety data sheet for Liquid Phosphorous 0-30-0 (Phosphoric Acid) did not accurately reflect the scientific evidence  used in making the hazard classification in that inaccurate information was provided in Section 5 and Section 6; on or about 8/22/12.    c) Entire Facility:  The material safety data sheet for Iron Max AC 6% 15-0-0 (Citric Acid) did not accurately reflect the scientific evidence  used in making the hazard classification in that inaccurate information was provided in Section 5 and Section 6; on or about 8/22/12.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Repeat Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2400.00 · Current $2400.00
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1):  The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was required to use the respirator in the workplace:    a) Product Manufacturing Areas:   The employer provided and required employees to use half-face air purifying respirators and did not provide a medical evaluation to determine ability of employees to wear them; on or about 5/24/12.       REPEAT STATEMENT      GROWTH PRODUCTS WAS PREVIOUSLY CITED FOR A SERIOUS VIOLATION OF THIS OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARD, ITS EQUIVALENT OR ESSENTIALLY SIMILAR STANDARD, 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1), WHICH WAS CONTAINED IN OSHA INSPECTION 313001166, CITATION 1, ITEM 1, ISSUED ON MARCH 2, 2010.  THE FINAL ORDER DATE WAS MARCH 26, 2010.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $2400
  • — Z (R) $2400

View GROWTH PRODUCTS LTD.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334471935.