Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: PICTURES & FRAMES, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PICTURES & FRAMES, INC. in 35 SOUTHWEST BLVD., KANSAS CITY, KS 66105 (NAICS 321999). OSHA activity number 334483351.

Watch Pictures & Frames, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Pictures & Frames, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
35 SOUTHWEST BLVD.
City
KANSAS CITY
State
KS
ZIP
66105
Mailing
35 SOUTHWEST BLVD., KANSAS CITY, KS 66105
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
321999
Employees
34
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.38 B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1785.00 · Current $1250.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.38(b):  An emergency action plan was not in writing, kept in the workplace, and available to employees for review:    Employee(s) working in the production department were exposed to fire, toxic chemicals, and tornados.  The employee(s) were exposed in that a written emergency action plan was not developed to instruct employee(s) of the action necessary when carrying out an immediate evacuation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1249.5
  • — Z (S) $1785

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2380.00 · Current $1666.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):    A personal protective equipment assessment was not performed to determine the types of personal protective equipment fork truck operators need when changing out propane tanks on fork trucks.  Employees were exposed to chemical hazards associated with propane.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1666
  • — Z (S) $2380

1910.178 Q07

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $500.00 · Current $350.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service, or were placed in service if the examination showed conditions adversely affecting the safety of the vehicle:    Employee(s) operating the Baker fork truck in the shipping department were exposed to physical injuries due to the bracket orientation pin for placing the propane cylinder in the correct position on the fork truck had broken off.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $350
  • — Z (S) $500

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1785.00 · Current $1250.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazard(s) created by:    Employee(s) operating the Delta drill press in the production department were exposed to physical injuries due to no guard being provided for the rotating drill chuck.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1249.5
  • — Z (S) $1785

1910.303 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2975.00 · Current $2083.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling:    Employee(s) plugging a floor box fan and a power strip into an unsecured metal receptacle box that was hanging on the east wall of the production department were exposed to electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2082.5
  • — Z (S) $2975

1910.178 L01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):    At the establishment employee(s) were exposed to struck-by hazards in that training was not provided for employee(s) who are authorized to operate powered industrial trucks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334483351.