MONTROSE, CO —
OSHA Inspection: PRAIRIE DOG ANTLERS
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of PRAIRIE DOG ANTLERS in 225 NORTH TOWNSEND AVENUE, MONTROSE, CO 81401 (NAICS 453910). OSHA activity number 334555364.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PRAIRIE DOG ANTLERS
- Site address
- 225 NORTH TOWNSEND AVENUE
- City
- MONTROSE
- State
- CO
- ZIP
- 81401
- Mailing
- 225 NORTH TOWNSEND AVENUE, MONTROSE, CO 81401
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 453910
- Employees
- 16
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 C01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1700.00 · Current $1700.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program, as described in paragraphs (c) through (o) of this section, whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (TWA) of 85 decibels measured on the A scale (slow response) or, equivalently, a dose of fifty percent: a) On or about June 4, 2012 and times prior, an effective hearing conservation program was not implemented at this facility when employee noise exposure exceeded a dose of 50 percent. The noise dose level for the monitored employee was 123.8%. Exposure to excessive noise levels may cause standard threshold shift and result in permanent hearing loss. Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1700
- — Z (S) $1700
1910.95 G01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(1): The employer did not establish and maintain an audiometric testing program as provided in this paragraph by making audiometric testing available to all employees whose exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels: a) On or about June 4, 2012 and times prior to, employees whose noise exposure exceeded an 8 hour time weighted average of 85 dBA were not included in an audiometric testing program. An 8-hour time weighted average of 85 dBA is equivalent to a noise dose of 50% and noise monitoring conducted on June 4, 2012, found employees' noise dose to be 123.8%. Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1020.00 · Current $1020.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): In any workplace where respirators are necessary to protect the health of the employee or whenever respirators are required by the employer, the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures. The program was not updated as necessary to reflect those changes in workplace conditions that affect respirator use. The employer did not include in the program the following provisions of this section, as applicable: a) On or about June 4, 2012 and times prior, the employer had not established and implemented an written Respiratory Protection program. Abatement Note: The respiratory protection programs shall include the elements listed in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i)-(ix). Abatement Verification: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1020
- — Z (S) $1020
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee is fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace. The employer may discontinue an employee's medical evaluations when the employee is no longer required to use a respirator: a) On or about June 4, 2012 and times prior, employees were exposed to potential illnesses in that, the employees were required to wear tight-fitting respirators prior to obtaining a medical evaluation. Abatement Note: The medical evaluation shall obtain the information requested by the questionnaire in Sections 1 and 2, Part A of Appendix C of this standard. A physician or other licensed health care professional shall evaluate the questionnaire. Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): The employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator is fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) is used, and at least annually thereafter: a) On or about June 4, 2012 and times prior, employees were exposed to potential illnesses in that, the employees were required to wear a tight-fitting respirator prior tol fit testing. Abatement Note: Fit testing shall follow the requirements listed in 29 CFR 1910.134(f). Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 H01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(1): Cleaning and disinfecting. The employer did not provide each respirator user with a respirator that is clean, sanitary, and in good working order. The employer did not ensure that respirators are cleaned and disinfected using the procedures in Appendix B-2 of this section, or procedures recommended by the respirator manufacturer, provided that such procedures are of equivalent effectiveness. The respirators was not cleaned and disinfected at the following intervals: a) On or about June 4, 2012 and times prior, employees were exposed to potential illnesses in that, the employees respirators were not maintained in a sanitary condition. Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 H02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(2): The employer did not ensure that respirators were stored in a sanitary condition: a) On or about June 4, 2012 and times prior, employees were exposed to potential illnesses in that, the employees respirators were not stored in a sanitary condition. Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 453910)
LACEY, WA—2026-07-15
WA317992077 - MUD BAY INC
WICHITA, KS—2026-07-14
PETCO ANIMAL SUPPLIES STORES, INC.
MONROVIA, CA—2026-05-28
PETSMART
CRESTWOOD, IL—2026-04-17
PETSMART LLC
PORTLAND, OR—2026-03-30
317743497 - WESTERN PET SUPPLY INC
More inspections in CO
BROOMFIELD, CO—2026-07-16
WAVELYNX TECHNOLOGIES LLC
COLORADO SPRINGS, CO—2026-07-15
ELMER CONTRACTOR LLC
SHERIDAN, CO—2026-07-15
JOHN'S COLLISION REPAIR, INC.
CENTENNIAL, CO—2026-07-15
BRAKES PLUS, INC
ENGLEWOOD, CO—2026-07-15
PCL CIVIL CONSTRUCTORS INC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334555364.