Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: PINE TREE PROPANE LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PINE TREE PROPANE LLC in 43 PROPANE LANE, HERMON, ME 04401 (NAICS 424710). OSHA activity number 334655586.

Watch Pine Tree Propane LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Pine Tree Propane LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
43 PROPANE LANE
City
HERMON
State
ME
ZIP
04401
Mailing
P.O. BOX 161, HAMPDEN, ME 04444
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
424710
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.119 D03 I B

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4250.00 · Current $2125.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(B):     Information pertaining to the equipment in the process did not include piping and instrument diagrams (P&ID's):    Establishment - The information pertaining to the equipment in the propane process did not include a piping and instrument diagram that included the following:  a)  the locations of the hydrostatic relief valves in the piping system  b)  an equipment schedule or equivalent means of identifying the specific safety relief valves on the propane storage tanks, hydrostatic valves in the piping system, compressor, and compressor relief valve.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2125
  • — Z (S) $4250

1910.119 D03 I D

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4250.00 · Current $2125.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(D):     Information pertaining to the equipment in the process did not include relief system design and design basis:    Establishment - Process safety information pertaining to equipment in the process did not include relief system design for the two 60,000 gallon propane storage tanks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2125
  • — Z (S) $4250

1910.119 G01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4250.00 · Current $2125.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(g)(1)(i):     Each employee involved in operating a process was not trained in the safe work practices applicable to the employee's job tasks:    Establishment - The Terminal Manager was not trained in Section 8, Hot Work Permit Procedure, of the Pine Tree Propane, LLC Standard Operating Procedures Manual.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2125
  • — Z (S) $4250

1910.119 K01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.119(k)(1):     The empoyer did not issue a hot work permit for hot work operations conducted on or near a covered process:    Establishment - The employer did not conform to their written Hot Work Permit Procedure in that hot work was conducted without a permit.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.119 J02

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4250.00 · Current $2125.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(2):     The employer did not establish and implement written procedures to maintain the on-going integrity of process equipment:    a)  Pressure Relief Valves on Propane Storage Tanks - The pressure relief valves protecting propane storage tanks #1 and #2 were not tested in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices since their installation on or about 1995 to verify that the valves perform reliably.      b)  Propane Storage Tanks - Propane storage tanks #1 and #2 did not receive an internal inspection in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices since their installation on or about 1995 to verify the ongoing integrity and remaining service life of the tanks.    c)  Propane Piping System - The propane piping system was not inspected and tested in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices since their installation on or about 1995 to verify the ongoing integrity and remaining service life of the piping.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2125
  • — Z (S) $4250

1910.119 L01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4250.00 · Current $2125.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(l)(1):     The employer did not implement written procedures to manage changes to process chemicals, technology, equipment, and procedures, and changes to facilities that affect a covered process:    Bobtail #2 Loading System - The employer did not implement written procedures to manage the following changes made to the liquid propane piping system:         1.  The employer removed an excess flow valve, replacing it with a Fisher Type C477-1625 valve having excess flow and automatic shutoff features.         2.  The employer relocated a Fisher Type N310-16 globe valve from a position near the bobtail load stanchion to a position near the meter.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2125
  • — Z (S) $4250

1910.119 L04

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4250.00 · Current $2125.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(l)(4):     Process safety information required by paragraph (d) of this section was not updated when a change covered by this paragraph resulted in a change in the process safety information:    The Pine Tree Propane Piping Plan was not updated in regard to the following changes:        a)  Bobtail #2 Loading System, Liquid Line - A Fisher Type N310-16 globe valve was relocated, and an excess flow valve was replaced with a Fisher Type C477-1625 valve which functioned as an excess flow and nitrogen-to-open automatic shutoff valve.      b)  Bobtail #2 Loading System - The methanol piping system was removed and a drain valve was installed where the methanol piping system connected to the propane liquid pipe.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2125
  • — Z (S) $4250

1910.119 O01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4250.00 · Current $2125.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(o)(1):     The employer did not evaluate compliance with the provisions of this section to verify that the procedures and practices developed under the standard were adequate and being followed:    Establishment - The Pine Tree Propane LLC Compliance Audit did not include an evaluation of compliance with the following:       Information Pertaining to the Equipment in the Process       Hot Work Permit program       Management of Change program
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2125
  • — Z (S) $4250

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334655586.