OSHA Inspection: JOSE DELCIB ROOFING CO.

Issued

2012-06-20 00:00:00

Abate by

2012-08-02 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2000.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1):     The employer did not initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part:    At the job site, an effective safety and health program was not in effect to prevent employee exposure to the following hazards:    a/  Struck-by hazards.  b/  Electrical hazards.  c/  Fall hazards during roofing work.

Issued

2012-06-20 00:00:00

Abate by

2012-08-02 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2):     The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:    At the job site, effective employee hazard recognition training was not being performed to prevent employee exposure to the following hazards:    a/  Struck-by hazards.  b/  Electrical hazards.  c/  Fall hazards during roofing work.

Issued

2012-06-20 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2400.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.100(a):     Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:    a/  At the job site, one employee picking up roofing debris along the north side of the home was not wearing a hard hat.  Three roofers above were engaged in installing roofing material directly above.

Issued

2012-06-20 00:00:00

Abate by

2012-06-27 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2400.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1):     Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:    a/  At the job site, roofers using Hitachi NV 45AB2 Coil Nailers, unknown m/n, or s/n, were not provided with or wearing safety glasses.

Issued

2012-06-20 00:00:00

Abate by

2012-06-27 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2800.00 · Current $1400.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.405(a)(2)(ii)(J):     Extension cord sets used with portable electric tools and appliances were not designed for hard or extra-hard usage:    a/  At the job site, the orange, flexible cord used to power a Porter Cable 150 P.S.I. Compressor was not designed for hard or extra-hard usage.

Issued

2012-06-20 00:00:00

Abate by

2012-06-27 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1):     Employees were permitted to work in proximity to electric power circuits and were not protected against electric shock by de-energizing and grounding the circuits or effectively guarding the circuits by insulation or other means:    a/  At the job site, employees removed pre-existing roofing material then installed new felt paper and shingles at the northwest corner of home.  The energized drop line entered the home at this location.  These employees were located approximately three feet from this drop line.

Issued

2012-06-20 00:00:00

Abate by

2012-06-27 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2800.00 · Current $1400.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):     Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph (b):    a/  At the job site, employees removing pre-existing and then installing new roofing material upon a steep roof were not protected from falling through the use of conventional fall protection.  The slope was measured at approximately 36 degrees or 9:12.  The ground to eave height was approximately 15 feet.