Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: POWER ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of POWER ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION COMPANY in 1501 VIKING STREET SUITE 200, ALAMEDA, CA 94501 (NAICS 336611). OSHA activity number 334715380.

Watch Power Engineering Construction Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Power Engineering Construction Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1501 VIKING STREET SUITE 200
City
ALAMEDA
State
CA
ZIP
94501
Mailing
1501 VIKING STREET SUITE 200, ALAMEDA, CA 94501
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336611
Employees
50
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01 VIII

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1785.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(viii): The respiratory protection program did not include training of employees in the proper use of respirators, including putting on and removing them, any limitations on their use, and their maintenance:      a)  Onboard crane barge:  Voids one number one thru twenty:  On or about June 14, 2012 and at times prior thereto, a supervisor used 3M 7503 dual cartridge respirator while checking welding operations in voids and had not been trained on the proper selection, use and maintenance of the respirator prior to use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $1785

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $1250.00
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:      a)  Onboard crane barge, voids number one thru twenty:  On or about June 14, 2012 and at times prior thereto, an employee was wearing a 3M 7503 dual cartridge respirator and had not been medically evaluated prior to using the respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $1249.5
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(f): The employee was required to use a respirator without being fit tested with the same make, model, style and size of respirator that was to be used:      a)  Onboard crane barge:  Voids number one thru twenty:  On or about June 14, 2012 and at times prior thereto, a supervisor used 3M 7503 dual cartridge respirator when entering spaces where welding was being done and had not been fit tested prior to use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1915.12 D01

Other-than-serious 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2380.00 · Current $1666.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1915.12(d)(1): The employer did not ensure that each employee entering a confined or enclosed space or other areas with dangerous atmospheres was trained to perform all required duties safely:      a)  Onboard crane barge voids number one thru twenty:  On or about June 14, 2012 and at times prior thereto, employees were working inside confined spaces and the employees had not been trained to perform their duties safely.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $1666
  • — Z (S) $2380

1915.12 E02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1915.12(e)(2): The employer did not inform outside rescue teams of the hazards that the team may encounter when called to perform confined and enclosed space or other dangerous atmosphere rescue at the employer's facility so that the rescue team can be trained and equipped:      a)  Onboard crane barge voids number one thru twenty: On or about June 14, 2012 and at times prior thereto, employees were working inside a confined spaces and the employer had not informed the outside rescue team of the hazards they may encounter if called to rescue employees from the  space.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1915.73 B

Other-than-serious 4 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1785.00 · Current $1785.00
29 CFR 1915.73(b): When employees were working in the vicinity of flush manholes and other small openings of comparable size in the deck and other working surfaces, such openings were not suitably covered or guarded to a height of not less than 30 inches:       (a) Onboard crane barge, main deck:  On or about June 14, 2012 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure access openings for voids were suitably covered or guarded to a height of not less than 30 inches, exposing employees to injury if they stepped into the opening.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $1785
  • — Z (S) $1785

1915.502 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1785.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1915.502(a):  The employer did not develop and implement a written fire safety plan that covers all the actions that employers and employees must take to ensure employee safety in the event of a fire:     a) Onboard crane barge:  On or about June 14, 2012 and at times prior thereto, employees were conducting hot work onboard the barge and the employer did not develop and implement a written fire safety plan that covers all the actions that employers and employees must take to ensure employee safety in the event of a fire.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $1785

1915.81 A01

Other-than-serious 8 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1915.81(a)(1): The employer did not maintain good housekeeping practices to eliminate hazards to employees:      (a) Onboard crane barge, main deck:  On or about June 14, 2012 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not maintain good housekeeping conditions at all times by not elevating hoses and electric conductors. The condition exposed employees to tripping hazards which could result in a fall on to a steel deck.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View POWER ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION COMPANY's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334715380.