HASTINGS, NE —
OSHA Inspection: JOAQUIN TURRUBRATES
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of JOAQUIN TURRUBRATES in 432 SOUTH SHORE DR., HASTINGS, NE 68902 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 334739737.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JOAQUIN TURRUBRATES
- Site address
- 432 SOUTH SHORE DR.
- City
- HASTINGS
- State
- NE
- ZIP
- 68902
- Mailing
- 518 SOUTH KANSAS ST., HASTINGS, NE 68901
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $1680.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. The employer failed to protect employees from potential fall hazards associated with re-roofing an existing residential home with a roof height over 9 ground to eave. The most recent example of this was found on the job site located at 432 South Shore Dr. Hastings, NE 68901 where the employer had employees re-roofing an existing residential home with ground eave heights over 9 and roof pitch greater than 4-12 without any form of fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2000.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer shall provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. The employer failed to protect employees from potential fall hazards associated with re-roofing an existing residential home with a roof height over 9 ground to eave. The most recent example of this was found on the job site located at 432 South Shore Dr. Hastings, NE 68901 where the employer has untrained employees re-roofing an existing residential home with ground eave heights over 9 and roof pitch greater than 4-12 without any form of fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $1680.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support. The employer failed to meet the requirements of this paragraph of the subpart in that they are failing to ensure that employees are using a ladder in accordance with the standards outlined in the regulation. The most recent example of this was found on the job site located at 432 South Shore Dr. Hastings, NE 68901 where the employer has employees re-roofing an existing residential home with ground eave heights over 6 and roof pitch greater than 4-12; using an extension ladder as a means of access and the ladder does not extend the minimum 3 above the walking/working surface.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.1053 B05 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladders shall be used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder is approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder (the distance along the ladder between the foot and the top support). The employer failed to meet the requirements of this paragraph of the subpart in that they are failing to ensure that employees are using a ladder in accordance with the standards outlined in the regulation. The most recent example of this was found on the job site located at 432 South Shore Dr. Hastings, NE 68901 where the employer has employees re-roofing an existing residential home with ground eave heights over 6 and roof pitch greater than 4-12; using an extension ladder as a means of access and the ladder is set up at an angle that exceeds the required 4:1 ratio.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2000.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer shall provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary. The program shall enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways, and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards. The employer is failing to provide the employees with training from a competent person necessary to identifying potential hazards associated with ladders and recognizing the requirements on when and how a ladder is to be used. The most recent example of this was found on the job site located at 432 South Shore Dr. Hastings, NE 68901 where the employer has employees using an extension ladder as access to an existing residential home roof without having provided the workers with any training on ladder safety and potential fall hazards associated with using ladders on a construction site.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2000
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
FAIRVIEW, TN—2026-07-16
MARVIN PINERA
CARSON CITY, NV—2026-07-16
UNKNOWN/INVALID ESTABLISHMENT
BANNOCKBURN, IL—2026-07-16
ROOFING H.P. LLC
LOXLEY, AL—2026-07-16
CARLOS CHE
BALTIMORE, MD—2026-07-16
VAL CONSTRUCTION INC
More inspections in NE
CRETE, NE—2026-07-15
SMITHFIELD FOODS
OMAHA, NE—2026-07-14
LACO ENTERPRISES, LLC
OMAHA, NE—2026-07-10
WINGSTOP
LINCOLN, NE—2026-07-01
SMITHFIELD PACKAGED MEATS CORP.
LINCOLN, NE—2026-06-30
PATRIOT PLUMBING, HEATING & AC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334739737.