OSHA Inspection: JLJOL ENTERPRISES, INC.

Issued

2012-10-10 00:00:00

Abate by

2012-11-23 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $1200.00 · Current $600.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards were present, or were likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):    a.  On or about June 21, 2012,  the employer did not assess the workplace to determine the need for personal protective equipment.

Issued

2012-10-10 00:00:00

Abate by

2012-11-09 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed through a written certification:    a.  On or about June 21,2012,  the employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed.

Issued

2012-10-10 00:00:00

Abate by

2012-11-09 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use personal protection equipment (PPE):    a.  On or about June 21, 2012,  employees were exposed to hazards during automotive servicing and air conditioner servicing. Employees were not trained to know at least the following:    1.  When PPE is necessary,   2. What PPE is necessary,   3. How to properly don, doff, adjust and wear PPE,   4. The limitations of PPE,   5. The proper care, maintenance, useful life and disposal of PPE.

Issued

2012-10-10 00:00:00

Abate by

2012-11-09 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.132(f)(2):     The employer did not verify through a written certification that each affected employee had received and understood personal protective equipment training as required by 29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1) - 29 CFR 1910.132(f)(3):    a.  On or about June 21, 2012, employees were exposed to hazards during automotive servicing and air conditioner servicing. The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that employees had been trained regarding the required workplace personal protection equipment assessment.

Issued

2012-10-10 00:00:00

Abate by

2012-10-17 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $1200.00 · Current $600.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.138(a):  The employer did not select and require employees to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasions; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes:    a. On or about June 21, 2012,  at the site address, employees were exposed to the hazard of frostbite and cryogenic burn hazards while working with air conditioning systems, air conditioning refrigerant manifold gauges and various refrigerants. Appropriate hand protection such as insulated gloves were not required or used to prevent injury.

Issued

2012-10-10 00:00:00

Abate by

2012-10-11 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $1200.00 · Current $600.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.305(j)(1)(i):  Fixtures, lampholders, lamps, rosettes, and receptacles located within 8 feet of the floor had live parts exposed to employee contact:    a.  On or about June 21, 2012,  the electrical light switch / receptacle at the backroom entrance door had exposed live electrical parts.  The employees were exposed to the hazards associated with live electrical parts.

Issued

2012-10-10 00:00:00

Abate by

2012-11-23 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $1200.00 · Current $600.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:      a.  On or about June 21, 2012, in the facility, employees required to perform automotive servicing and air conditioner servicing operations were exposed to contact with hazardous materials, including but not limited to, freon, sulfuric acid, carbon monoxide, ethyl alcohol, and ethylene glycol . The employer did not develop, implement and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program.

Issued

2012-10-10 00:00:00

Abate by

2012-11-23 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided information and training as specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) and (2) on hazardous chemicals including, but not limited to, freon, sulfuric acid, carbon monoxide, ethyl alcohol, and ethylene glycol in their work area are the time of their initial assignment and when ever a new hazard was introduced into their work area:     (i) Methods and observations that may be used to detect the presence or release of a hazardous chemical in the work area (such as monitoring conducted by the employer, continuous monitoring devices, visual appearance or odor of hazardous chemicals when being released, etc.);    (ii) The physical and health hazards of the chemicals in the work area;    (iii) The measures employees can take to protect themselves from these hazards, including specific procedures the employer has implemented to protect employees from exposure to hazardous chemicals, such as appropriate work practices, emergency procedures, and personal protective equipment to be used; and,    (iv) The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, including an explanation of the labeling system and the material safety data sheet, and how employees can obtain and use the appropriate hazard information.

Issued

2012-10-10 00:00:00

Abate by

2012-10-11 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein:      a.  On or about June 21, 2012,  in the facility,  a plastic spray bottle containing Simple Green were not labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical contained therein.

Issued

2012-10-10 00:00:00

Abate by

2012-10-11 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings:    a.  On or about June 21, 2012,  in the facility,  a plastic spray bottle containing Simple Green were not labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warning of the hazardous chemical contained therein.