Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: JOE RUBIN GENERAL CONTRACTOR

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JOE RUBIN GENERAL CONTRACTOR in 101 MORRIS AVE, SPRING LAKE, NJ 07762 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 335091583.

Watch JOE Rubin General Contractor — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for JOE Rubin General Contractor is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
101 MORRIS AVE
City
SPRING LAKE
State
NJ
ZIP
07762
Mailing
10 NEW FRIENDSHIP RD, HOWELL, NJ 07731
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $1600.00
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2):     Such programs shall provide for frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials, andequipment to be made by competent persons designated by the employers.    a)Rooftop: The employer did not initiate a program consisting of frequent and regular inspections of the worksite by a competent person.  Company employees were exposed to fall hazards and other related injuries when performing roofing and other related activiites at the worksite.  Condition noted on or about 06/21/12.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):     "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet(1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provisionin paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it isinfeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets therequirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fallprotection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.    a)Rooftop: Employees engaged in residential roofing activities at a height of 14 feet were not protected from falls by any means on or about 6/21/12.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335091583.