STAMFORD, CT —
OSHA Inspection: WELDING SERVICES, INC.
Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of WELDING SERVICES, INC. in 300 STILLWATER AVENUE, STAMFORD, CT 06902 (NAICS 238120). OSHA activity number 335233185.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- WELDING SERVICES, INC.
- Site address
- 300 STILLWATER AVENUE
- City
- STAMFORD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06902
- Mailing
- 2 PLUNKETT PLACE, WESTPORT, CT 06880
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Federal Agency (M)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238120
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l): JOBSITE: The employer did not ensure through the completion of a training program and evaluation that the Komatsu Forklift truck operator was competent to operate the truck safely.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $2000
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.1052 C01 II
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(ii): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever was less, were not equipped with one stairrail system along each unprotected side or edge: JOBSITE: The left side ascending/open side of the stairway having 5 steps was not equipped with appropriate handrail and stairrail system.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $2000
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.1052 C12
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(12): Unprotected sides and edges of stairway landings were not provided with guardrail systems that meet the criteria contained in Subpart M of 29 CFR 1926: Note: Guarding of landings for stairways and ladders are being maintained under Subpart M. JOBSITE: The stairway landing of the stairway was not equipped with a guardrail system.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $0
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards. JOBSITE: The employees using scissor lifts to have access existing structural steel beams to install channel steel beams were not provided with information and training regarding the safe use of the scissor lifts.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $2000
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards. Note: 29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2) may be cited as an additional violation to support this requirement. JOBSITE: The employees using a stairway and stairway landing to have access in and out of the jobsite were not provided with information and training regarding the safe use of the stairway and stairway landing.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $0
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.416 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1): Employees were permitted to work in proximity to electric power circuits and were not protected against electric shock by de-energizing and grounding the circuits or effectively guarding the circuits by insulation or other means: JOBSITE: The employees, engaged in installing channel-type steel beams (beams) to reinforce the existing structural steel beams (tasks) utilizing mobile scaffolds were allowed not only to position themselves, but also bring the beams in close proximity of the overhead electical wiring that had damaged electrical conduit and exposed live wiring. On or about 07/12/12, one of the employees came in contact with the above exposed live wiring while performing the task, and the employee was electrocuted from the incident.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $2800
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.416 A03
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(3): Before work began, the employer did not ascertain by inquiry, direct observation, or by instruments, whether any part of an energized electric power circuit, exposed or concealed, was so located that the performance of the work could bring any person, tool, or machine into physical or electrical contact with the electric power circuit. JOBSITE: Prior to commencing the "work", the employer did not ascertain through inquiry, direct observation, instruments and/or other means that the overhead electrical wiring that had damaged conduit and exposed live wiring (wiring) was located in close proximity of the work area and ensure through job briefing, instruction and visual observation that the employees, engaged in bringing up and manuevering channel steel beams utilizing mobile scaffolds in and around the wiring to reinforce the existing overhead steel beams were appropriately protected from coming in conatact with the wiring while performaing the above task. On or about 07/12/12, one of employees came in contact with the exposed wiring while performing the above task, and the employee was electrocuted from the incident.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $2800
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
More inspections at WELDING SERVICES, INC.
BLAINE, WA—2012-04-12 00:00:00
WELDING SERVICES INC
NORCROSS, GA—2005-06-01 00:00:00
WELDING SERVICES INC.
SAINT ALBANS, WV—2004-04-20 00:00:00
WELDING SERVICES INC
ORRINGTON, ME—2004-01-22 00:00:00
WELDING SERVICES INC.
LOUISVILLE, KY—2002-11-26 00:00:00
WELDING SERVICES, INC.
View WELDING SERVICES, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238120)
EL PASO, TX—2026-07-15
SURE STEEL
NAMPA, ID—2026-07-15
ELITE STEEL ERECTORS, LLC
GARDENDALE, AL—2026-07-09
ANDINO'S IRON WORKERS, LLC
MIDLOTHIAN, VA—2026-07-09
B & J STEEL CONSTRUCTION, INC.
LYNCHBURG, VA—2026-07-09
GRAY'S WELDING LLC
More inspections in CT
ENFIELD, CT—2026-07-16
MOMS ENFIELD
DAYVILLE, CT—2026-07-16
HARBOR FREIGHT
NEW BRITAIN, CT—2026-07-14
JANANII, LLC
NEWINGTON, CT—2026-07-14
TRUSS MANUFACTURING INC
NORTH BRANFORD, CT—2026-07-14
NYK STATEWIDE MOLINA CONSTRUCTION LLC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335233185.