Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: TRI-STATE PAINTING INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of TRI-STATE PAINTING INC. in BU BRIDGE, BOSTON, MA 02108 (NAICS 238320). OSHA activity number 335493417.

Watch Tri-State Painting INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Tri-State Painting INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
BU BRIDGE
City
BOSTON
State
MA
ZIP
02108
Mailing
P.O. BOX 1240, TILTON, NH 03276
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238320
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.251 E08

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3850.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.251(e)(8):     Synthetic web slings were not immediately removed from service if any of the following conditions specified in 1926.251(e)(8)(i) through (e)(8)(v) were present:  (i) Acid or caustic burns; (ii) Melting or charring of any part of the sling surface; (iii) snags, punctures, tears, or cuts; (iv) broken or worn stitches; or (v) distortion of fittings.    Jobsite:    A synthetic web sling used to lift the load had snags and broken threads along its edge.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $3850

1926.251 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.251(a)(1):     Rigging equipment for material handling was not inspected prior to use on each shift and as necessary during its use to ensure that it was safe.      Jobsite:    Both sets of synthetic web slings used to lift Safespan bridge decking were not protected from being cut by the decking's sharp edges.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1412 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3850.00 · Current $2310.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1412(e)(1): The equipment in service was not inspected each month in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section (each shift).      Jobsite:    The company did not have monthly crane inspection records for May and June of 2012: it only provided OSHA with a July 31, 2012 inspection report.  Information provided by the General Contractor established that the crane was used in June 2012.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2310
  • — Z (S) $3850

1926.1417 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3850.00 · Current $2310.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1417(c)(1):     29 CFR 1926.1417(c)(1): The procedures applicable to the operation of the equipment, including rated capacities (load charts), recommended operating speeds, special hazard warnings, instructions, and operators manual, were not readily available in the cab at all times for use by the operator.     Jobsite:    The Operators Manual was not in the cab or in any other location on the boom truck crane.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2310
  • — Z (S) $3850

1926.1417 O03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5390.00 · Current $3773.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1417(o)(3):     29 CFR 1926.1417(o)(3): The employer failed to makes sure the operator verified that the load is within the rated capacity of the equipment by at least one of the methods outlined in 1926.1417(o)(3)(i)-(ii).    Jobsite:    The employer did not ensure that the load was within the rated capacity of the Simon Ro TC 4792 crane which resulted in the crane tipping over.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3773
  • — Z (S) $5390

1926.1425 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3080.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1425(c)(1):     29 CFR 1926.1425(c)(1): The employer did not make sure that the materials being hoisted when employees were hooking, unhooking, or guiding the load were rigged to prevent unintentional displacement.    Jobsite:    A loose piece of bridge decking was not protected from unintentional displacement when it was not secured by slings or other rigging to the rest of the load.  The unsecured decking exposed workers to a struck-by hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $3080

1926.1425 C03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1425(c)(3):     The materials must be rigged by a qualified rigger.    Jobsite:    The load was not rigged by qualified riggers.  Riggers used unsafe rigging practices, including combining 2 slings to make 1 sling, not protecting slings from sharp load edges, and not adequately securing the load.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1427 F01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5390.00 · Current $3773.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1427(f)(1):     The employer did not ensure that a crane operator-in-training was adequately trained to allow him or her to safely  operate the crane.    Jobsite:    The crane operator, who was unlicensed, was not sufficiently trained to prevent the crane from tipping over.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3773
  • — Z (S) $5390

1926.1427 F03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1427(f)(3):     Trainer. While operating the equipment, the operator-in-training was not continuously monitored by an individual ("operator's trainer") who meets all of the following requirements of this subparagraph:    Jobsite:    The crane operator was not licensed to operate the crane.  The Supervisor, who was licensed, did not monitor the activities of the crane operator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1416 B

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $38500.00 · Current $27834.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1416(b):     Operations were performed when the listed operational aids were not in proper working order.  Temporary alternative measures were not used and the time periods permitted for repairing defective operational aids are specified in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section were exceeded.     Jobsite:      The Simon Stinger crane was used when its PAT load moment indicator was inoperable.  No alternative operational aids were used and the crane tipped over.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (W) $27834
  • — Z (W) $38500

View TRI-STATE PAINTING INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335493417.