Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: KAMINSKI PAINTING / MAINTENANCE

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of KAMINSKI PAINTING / MAINTENANCE in 1350 WASHINGTON STREET, CANTON, MA 02021 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 335654984.

Watch Kaminski Painting / Maintenance — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Kaminski Painting / Maintenance is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1350 WASHINGTON STREET
City
CANTON
State
MA
ZIP
02021
Mailing
791 SUMNER STREET, STOUGHTON, MA 02072
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238170
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $600.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns:    Location- 1350 Washington Street, Canton, MA:  On or about 07/03/12, the employer did not ensure each employee working below siding operations was wearing a hard hat.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $600
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.102 A02

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $800.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(2): Eye and face protective equipment being used did not used meet the requirements specified in Z 87.1-1968.    Location - 1350 Washington Street, Canton, MA; Driveway of residence:  On or about 07/03/12, the employees using power saws, pnemautic nail guns and paint sprayers were wearing sun glasses which did not meet the requirement of safety glasses.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.404 B01 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $800.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(iii): Where ground-fault circuit interrupters were not utilized, employer did not establish and implement an assured equipment grounding conductor program on the construction site covering all cord sets, receptacles which are not part of the building or structure, and equipment connected by cord and plug which were available and used by employees.    Location - 1350 Washington Street, Canton, MA:  The employer did not implement an assured equipment grounding conductor program on the site for their extension cords.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.404 F06

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, or enclosures was not permanent and continuous:    Location: 1350 Washington Street, Canton, MA:  On or about 07/03/12, the following electrical equipment was missing its ground pin; a Hepavac wet/dryvac, a Titan 740i airless sprayer, and a DeVilbiss air compressor.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.416 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $600.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.416(e)(1): Worn or frayed electric cords or cables were used:    Location: 1350 Washington Street, Canton, MA; Driveway of residence:  On or about 07/03/12, the insulation sheathing to the 100 foot cord reel was worn off and missing in various sections of the cord exposing the conductors.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $600
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1400.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):     Location: 1350 Washington Street, Canton, MA; Lower flat roof:   On or about 07/03/12, an employee installing new cedar shingles on a residential facade, was not protected from falling 23 feet from the roof.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:    Location: 1350 Washington Street, Canton, MA; lower flat roof:  The employer did not provide any fall protection training for an employee working from a roof 23 feet above the ground.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335654984.