Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: OILFIELD TRUCKING SOLUTIONS

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of OILFIELD TRUCKING SOLUTIONS in 2419 S. MERRITT, ELK CITY, OK 73644 (NAICS 213112). OSHA activity number 335863403.

Watch Oilfield Trucking Solutions — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Oilfield Trucking Solutions is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2419 S. MERRITT
City
ELK CITY
State
OK
ZIP
73644
Mailing
4050 W I-40 SERVICE RD., OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73108
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
213112
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.106 E06 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $7000.00 · Current $4200.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.106(e)(6)(i):  Adequate precautions were not taken to prevent the ignition of flammable vapors.  Sources of ignition include but are not limited to open flames; lightning; smoking; cutting and welding; hot surfaces; frictional heat; static, electrical, and mechanical sparks; spontaneous ignition, including heat-producing chemical reactions; and radiant heat:      At the worksite:  On or about August 11, 2012, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not take adequate precautions to prevent the ignition of flammable vapor by placing a diesel engine powered mud pump unit next to the skid mounted mud tank.  The mud pump and mud tank were being used to blend/mix crude oil and condensate.  Employees were exposed to hazards associated with fire and explosion.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4200
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.119 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $7000.00 · Current $4200.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(1):  The employer did not perform an initial process hazard analysis (hazard evaluation) on processes covered by this standard:    At the worksite:  On or about August 11, 2012, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not perform a process hazard analysis (PHA) for blending/mixing crude oil and condensate.  Employees were exposed to hazards associated with fire and explosion.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4200
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.119 F01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $7000.00 · Current $4200.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1):  The employer did not develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process safety information:    At the worksite:  On or about August 11, 2012, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not develop and implement written operating procedures for blending/mixing crude oil and condensate.  Employees were exposed to hazards associated with fire and explosion.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4200
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.119 G01 I

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $7000.00 · Current $4200.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(g)(1):  Each employee presently involved in operating a process, and each employee before being involved in operating a newly assigned process, were not trained in an overview of the process and in the operating procedures as specified in paragraph (f) of this section:    At the worksite:  On or about August 11, 2012, and at times prior thereto, the employer did provide adequate training to their employees in an overview of the process and in the operating procedures for blending/mixing crude oil and condensate.  Employees were exposed to hazards associated with fire and explosion.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4200
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying the evaluation has been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:      At the worksite:  On or about August 11, 2012, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not have written certification that a hazard assessment had been performed for the blending/mixing crude oil and condensate process.  Employees were exposed to hazards associated with fire and explosion.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View OILFIELD TRUCKING SOLUTIONS's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335863403.