OSHA Inspection: JLD PALLET LLC

Issued

2012-10-17 00:00:00

Abate by

2012-12-21 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2400.00 · Current $1680.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.147(d)(4)(i):     Lockout or tagout devices were not affixed to each energy isolating device by authorized employees:    a. During work requiring lockout, such as but not limited to, changing blades, sharpening blades, and cleaning equipment, machines were not locked out.    Abatement documentation is required for this violation.

Issued

2012-10-17 00:00:00

Abate by

2012-12-21 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i):     Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:    a. Where work required lockout, such as but not limited to, changing blades, sharpening blades, and cleaning equipment, a lockout program was not written (and according to the standard requirements; see 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(A) through (D)).    Abatement documentation is required for this violation.

Issued

2012-10-17 00:00:00

Abate by

2012-12-21 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i):     The employer did not provide adequate training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program was understood by employees:    a. Lockout training, according to the standard requirements, was not provided for both authorized and affected employees, including when, how, and where to lockout, under what circumstances lockout was to be made, all energy sources for equipment, how to test equipment to ensure it is locked out, and review of written procedures with authorized employees.    Abatement documentation is required for this violation.

Issued

2012-10-17 00:00:00

Abate by

2012-12-21 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.303(b)(1)(ii):     Electrical equipment was not free from recognized hazards, based on the mechanical strength and durability, including, for parts designed to enclose and protect other equipment, the adequacy of the protection thus provided:    a. The electrical panel disconnect switch, which included providing power to the gang saw, and was designed to accept a lock when turned to the off position, was not functioning correctly so that the spring loaded piece would not open to accept a lock.    Abatement documentation is required for this violation.

Issued

2012-10-17 00:00:00

Abate by

2012-12-21 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6):     The employer did not certify that each operator had been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l):    a. Where a forklift and two loaders were operated, training was not certified (documented).    Abatement documentation is required for this violation.