Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: SERGIO RUIZ

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of SERGIO RUIZ in 1869 MOUNT ZION ROAD, MORROW, GA 30260 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 337689822.

Watch Sergio Ruiz — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Sergio Ruiz is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
SERGIO RUIZ
Site address
1869 MOUNT ZION ROAD
City
MORROW
State
GA
ZIP
30260
Mailing
1038 WILBORN DRIVE, MARIETTA, GA 30064
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1400.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:     (a) Employees installing an Exterior Insulation Finishing System (EIFS) from 4-tier tubular welded scaffold systems were not able to recognize hazards associated with their work environment due to the employer not establishing an accident prevention program. Employees were exposed to fall and struck-by hazards as well as chemical burns while working with Portland cement.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program which included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):     (a) Employees using Portland cement to install an Exterior Insulation Finishing System (EIFS) were not able to recognize hazards associated with the use of caustic material. A written hazard communication program was not established and implemented, exposing the employees to chemical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.   (a) Employees installing an Exterior Insulation Finishing System (EIFS) were not instructed in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions when using tubular welded scaffold systems, exposing the employees to a fall hazard from heights exceeding 25 feet above the next lower level.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1400.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii):     (a) On the northeast side of the building, two employees were installing an Exterior Insulation Finishing System (EIFS) from a four-tier tubular welded frame scaffold system that was not fully planked. One employee was exposed to a fall of 19 feet, 10 inches while working from the third tier and the second employee working from the fourth tier was exposed to a fall of more than 25 feet.     (b) On the southeast side of the building, two employees were installing an Exterior Insulation Finishing System (EIFS) from a four-tier tubular welded frame scaffold system that was not fully planked.  One employee was exposed to a fall of 16 feet, 6 inches while working from the third tier and the second employee working from the fourth tier was exposed to a fall of 21 feet, 5 inches.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 C02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1400.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, and uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation:     (a) On the southeast side of the building, employees were installing an Exterior Insulation Finishing System (EIFS) from a four tier tubular welded frame scaffold that was erected on unstable footing and uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills, exposing an employee to a fall of 21 feet, 5 inches from the upper work platform and a second employee working from the third tier to a fall of 16 feet, 6 inches.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 E06 I

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1400.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(6)(i): Integral prefabricated scaffold access frames were not specifically designed or constructed for use as ladder rungs:     (a) On the northeast side of the building, employees were climbing the prefabricated end frame of a four tier tubular welded frame scaffold as if the frame had been designed for use as ladder rungs. The employer did not provide an access ladder, exposing the employees to a fall hazard exceeding 25 feet.     (b) On the southeast side of the building, employees were climbing the prefabricated end frame of a four tier tubular welded frame scaffold as if the frame had been designed for use as ladder rungs.  An extension ladder was installed to access the second tier. The employees were required to climb the end frame to access the third and fourth tier, exposing the employees to a fall of up to 21 feet, 5 inches.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1400.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:    (a) The employer did have a competent person inspect tubular welded frame scaffold systems prior to allowing the employees to use the four tier scaffold systems to install an Exterior Insulation Finishing System (EIFS), exposing the employees to a fall hazard of more than 16 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1400.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:     (a) On the northeast side of the building, two employees working from a four tier tubular welded frame scaffold installing an Exterior Insulation Finishing System (EIFS) were not protected from falling. One employee working from the third tier was exposed to a fall of 19 feet, 10 inches and a second employee working from the fourth tier was exposed to a fall of more than 25 feet.      (b) On the southeast side of the building, two employees working from a four tier tubular welded frame scaffold installing an Exterior Insulation Finishing System (EIFS) were not protected from falling. One employee working from the third tier was exposed to a fall of 16 feet, 6 inches and a second employee working from the fourth tier was exposed to a fall of 21 feet, 6 inches.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.452 C02

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1400.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.452(c)(2): Tubular welded frames and panels were not braced by cross, horizontal, or diagonal braces, or combination thereof, which would have secured vertical members together laterally:     (a) On the northeast side of the building, employees were installing an Exterior Insulation Finishing System (EIFS) from a four tier tubular welded frame scaffold that was not properly braced. Cross braces had only been installed on certain portions of the scaffold system. An employee working from the third tier was exposed to a fall of 19 feet, 10 inches while an employee working from the fourth tier was exposed to a fall of more than 25 feet.     (b) On the southeast side of the building, employees were installing an Exterior Insulation Finishing System (EIFS) from a four tier tubular welded frame scaffold system that was not properly braced. Cross braces had only been installed on certain portions of the scaffold. An employee working from the third tier was exposed to a fall of 16 feet, 6 inches while an employee working from the fourth tier was exposed to a fall of 21 feet, 5 inches.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337689822.