Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: TRANSPORTATION EQUIPMENT SPECIALISTS, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of TRANSPORTATION EQUIPMENT SPECIALISTS, INC. in 11637 CAMDEN ROAD, JACKSONVILLE, FL 32218 (NAICS 811121). OSHA activity number 338366248.

Watch Transportation Equipment Specialists, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Transportation Equipment Specialists, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
11637 CAMDEN ROAD
City
JACKSONVILLE
State
FL
ZIP
32218
Mailing
11637 CAMDEN ROAD, JACKSONVILLE, FL 32218
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811121
Employees
25
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1700.00 · Current $1020.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent:  a.  An employee working as an abrasive blaster was exposed to a noise dose of 103.5%, or an equivalent dBA of 90.2 dBA, which was capable of causing permanent hearing loss. The sampling was performed for 297 minutes during one shift on January 31, 2013.  The employer did not have a continuing, effective hearing conservation program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1020
  • — Z (S) $1700

1910.107 C06

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $1020.00 · Current $612.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(c)(6): Electrical wiring, motors, and other equipment outside of but within twenty (20) feet of any spray area, and not separated therefrom by partitions, produced sparks under normal operating conditions and did not otherwise conform to the provisions of subpart S of this part for Class I, Division 2 Hazardous Locations:  a.  On or about January 15, 2013, in the open painting bay, on the sidewall near the front of the bay, a wall mounted electrical receptacle box used to power a radio was within 20 feet of the spraying area, exposing the employee to fire hazards.  b. On or about January 15, 2013, in the open painting bay, on the sidewall near the back of the bay, a wall mounted electrical receptacle box used to power a floor fan was within 20 feet of the spraying area, exposing the employee to fire hazards.    ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION ARE NOT REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $612
  • — Z (S) $1020

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1680.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  a.  On or about January 31, 2013, the abrasive blaster was required to wear a respirator and the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program that addressed the worksite-specific procedures such as but not limited to employee medical evaluation, and training on the use, maintenance and care of the respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1680
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.134 D01 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(ii): The employer did not select and use a NIOSH-certified respirator in compliance with the conditions of its certification:  a.  On or about January 31, 2013, the employer used a non-Bullard air supply hose in the Bullard 88VX series airline respirator assembly which voided the NIOSH approval of the entire assembly.   OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE  29 CFR 1910.94(a)(5)(i): The employer did not use a respirator approved by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) under 42 CFR part 84 to protect employees from dust produced during abrasive-blasting operations:  a.  On or about January 31, 2013, the employer used a non-Bullard air supply hose in the Bullard 88VX series airline respirator assembly which voided the NIOSH approval of the entire assembly.    ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION ARE NOT REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a.  On or about January 31, 2013, an employee who wore a Bullard Helmet and 3M half face respirator had not been provided with a medical evaluation prior to wearing the respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1000 C

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1910.1000(c): An employee was exposed to Silica, Crystalline Quartz (Respirable Fraction) in excess of the 8-hour time weighted average limits of 0.16 mg/m3 listed in Table Z-3:  a.  An employee abrasive blasting a shipping container was exposed to Silica, Crystalline Quartz (Respirable Fraction) at a Time Weighted Average (TWA) of 75.7 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m3), 473.1 times the limit of 0.16 mg/m3. The sampling was performed for 306 minutes during one shift on January 31, 2013.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1700.00 · Current $1020.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  a.  On or about January 15, 2013, the employer did not develop and implement the written hazard communication program which described how requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) would be met for employees who have exposure to hazardous materials such as but not limited to silica sand, oils, paints, and solvents.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1020
  • — Z (S) $1700

1910.1200 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical in use:  a.  On or about January 15, 2013, the employer did not have material safety data sheets for the hazardous materials used by employees such as but not limited silica sand, oils, paints, and solvents.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a.  On or about January 15, 2013, the employer did not provide information and training to employees who have exposure to hazardous materials such as but not limited to silica sand, oils, paints, and solvents.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  a. On or about February 5, 2013, an employee who was required to wear a NIOSH approved 3M half face respirator had not been fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338366248.