OSHA Inspection: MAZZONE HOSPITALITY

Issued

2013-04-29 00:00:00

Abate by

2013-05-07 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2550.00 · Current $2500.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:    a) On or about February 5, 2013 and at times prior thereto in the warehouse; employees were performing construction activies without any type of training in the recognition and avoidance of hazards associated with demolition work.

Issued

2013-04-29 00:00:00

Abate by

2013-05-07 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3400.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.23(a)(1): Every stairway floor opening was not guarded by a standard railing constructed in accordance with paragraph (e) of this section on all exposed sides (except at the entrance to the stairway):    a) On or about February 5, 2013 and at times prior thereto, in the chefs office: the Stairway floor opening was not protected by a standard railing in that it did not have a mid rail and did not meet the 42" height requirement due to the top stair being below the landing.

Issued

2013-04-29 00:00:00

Abate by

2013-05-07 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.24(b): Fixed stairs were not provided for access from one structure level to another where operations necessitated regular travel between levels, and for access to operating platforms at any equipment which requires attention routinely during operations:    a)  On or about February 5, 2013 and at times prior thereto in the kitchen area:  A portable metal stairway was used for access the chef's office on the second floor.

Issued

2013-04-29 00:00:00

Abate by

2013-05-07 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.24(g): Stairway platforms were less than the width of a stairway and not a minimum of 30 inches in length measured in the direction of travel:    a)  On or about February 5, 2013 and at times prior thereto, in the kitchen:  No stairway platform was provided/installed where employees access the chefs office.

Issued

2013-04-29 00:00:00

Abate by

2013-05-07 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2550.00 · Current $2500.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.96: Safety-toe footwear for employees did not meet the requirements and specifications in American National Standard for Men's Safety-Toe Footwear, Z41.1-1967:    a) On or about February 5, 2013 and at time prior thereto, in the warehouse:  Three (3) employees were performing demolition work while wearing sneakers/street shoes with no safety-toes.

Issued

2013-04-29 00:00:00

Abate by

2013-05-07 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  a)  On or about February 5, 2013 and at times prior thereto, in the warehouse: employees were performing demolition work without use of head protection.

Issued

2013-04-29 00:00:00

Abate by

2013-05-07 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:  a) On or about February 5, 2013 and at times prior thereto, in the warehouse:  Employees were performing demolition work in an interior office without the use of protective eyewear.

Issued

2013-04-29 00:00:00

Abate by

2013-05-07 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $5100.00 · Current $5000.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.850(a): An engineering survey was not performed by a competent person to determine the conditions of the framing floors and walls and the possibility of unplanned collapse of any portion of the structure prior to permitting employees to start demolition operations:    a) On or about February 5, 2013 and at times prior thereto, in the warehouse:  An engineering survey was not completed prior to demolition of an interior office area, in that hazards associated with unplanned collapse were not evaluated.