EUCLID, OH —
OSHA Inspection: SUPERLUBE COMPLETE CAR CARE CENTER
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SUPERLUBE COMPLETE CAR CARE CENTER in 21217 EUCLID AVE., EUCLID, OH 44117 (NAICS 811111). OSHA activity number 338909914.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SUPERLUBE COMPLETE CAR CARE CENTER
- Site address
- 21217 EUCLID AVE.
- City
- EUCLID
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44117
- Mailing
- 7071 WEST 130TH ST, CLEVELAND, OH 44130
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 811111
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $1680.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative: On or about February 20, 2013, the employer failed to ensure that employees working on vehicles were protected against accidental start up. Employees leave the keys in the vehicle while performing maintenance such as, but no limited to, oil changes, fixing anti-freeze leaks and making general engine repairs.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.157 G02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3500.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(2): The educational program to familiarize employees with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting was not provided to all employees upon initial employment, and at least annually thereafter: On or about February 20, 2013, the employer failed to train employees on proper use of fire extinguishers. Note the employer may exercise one of the following options: 1. Provide portable fire extinguishers as specified in 29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1), meet the distribution requirements per 29 CFR 1910.157(d) (75 to the nearest extinguisher for Class A fires and 50 to the nearest unit for Class B fires), and provide training and education for all employees in the use of such equipment and the hazards associated with incipient stage fire fighting as specified in 29 CFR 1910.157(g). The other sections of 29 CFR also apply. 2. Provide extinguishers as specified in 29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1), designate certain employees to be the only employees authorized to use such equipment and require all other employees to immediately evacuate upon the sound of the fire alarm, establish this in writing in an emergency action plan as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.38(a) and train/educate designated employees per 1910.157(g). Utilizing this option exempts the employer from distribution requirements of 29 CFR 1910.157(d). 3. Establish a written fire safety policy which requires the immediate and total evacuation of employees from the workplace upon the sounding of a fire alarm signal. This policy shall include an emergency action plan and a fire prevention plan as specified in 29 CFR 1910.38(a) and 29 CFR 1910.39(a). Utilizing this option exempts the employer from the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.157 to include the need for providing portable fire equipment unless a specific standard requires that a portable fire extinguisher be provided (such as those requirements in 29 CFR 1910.106/107 related to the use/storage of flammable/combustible liquids). If extinguishers are provided, but not intended for employee use, 29 CFR 1910.157(e) and (f) are still applicable (inspection, maintenance, and testing of equipment).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.215 A02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2100.00 · Current $1260.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(2): Abrasive wheel(s) used on grinding machinery were not provided with safety guard(s) which covered the spindle end, nut, flange projections: On or about February 20, 2013, the employer failed to ensure employees that use the orange bench grinder on the back wall were protected against accidental contact with the spindle end nut.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1260
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.215 A04
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Grinding machinery was not used with work rest(s) to support offhand grinding work: On or about February 20, 2013, the employer failed to ensure employees using the orange bench grinder on the back wall were protected against accidental contact with the grinding wheel due to missing work rests.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch: On or about February 20, 2013, the orange bench grinder on the back wall did not have tongue guards in place.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.253 B04 III
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3500.00 · Current $3500.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(4)(iii): Oxygen cylinders in storage were not separated from fuel-gas cylinders or combustible materials (especially oil or grease), a minimum distance of 20 feet (6.1 m) or by a noncombustible barrier at least 5 feet (1.5 m) high having a fire-resistance rating of at least 1/2 hour: On or about February 20, 2013, the employer failed to ensure oxygen and acetylene used for welding were separated and stored properly.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3500
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.253 E05 IV
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3500.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.253(e)(5)(iv): Hose connections were not clamped or otherwise securely fastened in a manner that would withstand, without leakage, twice the pressure to which they would normally be subjected in service, but in no case less than a pressure of 300 PSI: On or about February 20, 2013, the employer failed to ensure a splice to the oxygen line of the oxygen and acetylene (fuel-gas) welder met the 300 PSI test.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii): On or about February 20, 2013, the employer failed to have a written Hazard Communication program for employees that use chemicals such as, but not limited to, battery cleaner which contains xylene and acetone, brake cleaner which contains tetrachloroethelene, and other chemicals needed for general vehicle maintenance.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use: On or about February 20, 2013, the employer failed to have Safety Data Sheets for employees that use chemicals such as, but not limited to, battery cleaner which contains xylene and acetone, brake cleaner which contains tetrachloroethelene, and other chemicals needed for general vehicle maintenance.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: On or about February 20, 2013, the employer failed to train employees on safe use for chemicals such as, but not limited to, battery cleaner which contains xylene and acetone, brake cleaner which contains tetrachloroethelene, and other chemicals needed for general vehicle maintenance.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 811111)
LONGVIEW, WA—2026-07-09
WA317992006 - LONGVIEW AUTO REPAIR LLC
HOUGHTON LAKE, MI—2026-07-08
WILSON'S AUTOMOTIVE
KELSO, WA—2026-07-08
WA317991989 - THOMAS TRANSMISSIONS LLC
BURTON, MI—2026-07-07
AMERICA'S MOST WANTED 4X4
FISHERS, IN—2026-07-07
PEP BOYS AUTO SERVICE & TIRES
More inspections in OH
OXFORD, OH—2026-07-13
R&R SIDING LLC
CONNEAUT, OH—2026-07-13
CONTINENTAL STRUCTURAL PLASTICS
CAMDEN, OH—2026-07-13
ALBERTO MORALES
HARRISON, OH—2026-07-10
WEBER FAMILY FARMS LLC
JEFFERSON, OH—2026-07-10
LAKE CITY PLATING LLC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338909914.