Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: JASON'S CUSTOM METAL POLISHING, LLC

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of JASON'S CUSTOM METAL POLISHING, LLC in 37443 ROYALTON RD., GRAFTON, OH 44044 (NAICS 332813). OSHA activity number 338921661.

Watch Jason'S Custom Metal Polishing, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Jason'S Custom Metal Polishing, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
37443 ROYALTON RD.
City
GRAFTON
State
OH
ZIP
44044
Mailing
37443 ROYALTON RD., GRAFTON, OH 44044
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332813
Employees
1
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.22 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): All places of employment, passageways, storerooms or service rooms were not kept clean and orderly or in a sanitary condition.       1.)  On or about February 27, 2013, the employer failed to keep floors and walls free of combustible dust in the polishing area, exposing employees to hazards from fire and explosion.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $800.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:     a.)  On or about February 27, 2013, the employer failed to ensure that the rotating parts on the buffing wheel machine was adequately guarded.  The rotating shaft on the wheel was not guarded exposing employees to caught in hazards.       b.)  On or about February 27, 2013, the employer failed to ensure that the belt on the sanding/polishing machine was adequately guarded.  The belt is open and rotating exposing employees to caught in hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, material safety data sheets, and employee information and training:        1.) On or about February 27, 2013,  The employer failed to implement the elements of a written hazard communication program.  Employees were exposed to hazards from combustible dust.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:      1.) On or about February 27, 2013 the employer did not ensure that employees were provided with information in the safe handling of combustible dusts.  Employees were not aware of the fire and explosion hazards associated with combustible dusts.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1026 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(1): The employer with a workplace or work operation covered by this standard did not determine the 8-hour time-weighted average exposure for each employee exposed to chromium VI:   1.) On or about February 27, 2013, the employer failed to conduct exposure monitoring to determine employee's exposure to hexavalent chromium while polishing stainless steel.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338921661.