AUBURN, ME —
OSHA Inspection: WELLNESS CONNECTION OF MAINE
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of WELLNESS CONNECTION OF MAINE in 33 OMNI DRIVE, AUBURN, ME 04210 (NAICS 325411). OSHA activity number 338935521.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- WELLNESS CONNECTION OF MAINE
- Site address
- 33 OMNI DRIVE
- City
- AUBURN
- State
- ME
- ZIP
- 04210
- Mailing
- 33 OMNI DRIVE, AUBURN, ME 04210
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 325411
- Employees
- 20
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3500.00 · Current $2975.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): At the Facility - The employer did not conduct an assessment of the workplace to determine if PPE is required.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2975
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: At the Facilitiy - Appropriate eye protection was not required nor provided by the employer when employees were working wiith bleach, a corrosive chemical.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3500.00 · Current $2975.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: At the Facility - Employees exposed to a 12.5% solution of sodium hypochlorite were not provided with an eye wash station or a shower for emergency use.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2975
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $2380.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: Twister Room - Guarding was not provided on the two twisting machines to protect the operators from the rotating drum and brush assembly.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2380
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.219 D01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1): Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o): Twister Room - The belt and pulley assembly on the two twisters were not guarded.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.305 G01 IV A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $2380.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure: Twister Room - Extension cords were being used to supply power to the twister machines which are permanently located or fixed pieces of equipment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2380
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3500.00 · Current $2975.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: At the Facility - The employer had not developed nor implemented a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2975
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical in use: At the Facility - The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for the 12.5% solution of sodium hypochlorite.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: At the Facility - Employees had not been trained in the hazards of the chemicals in their work area and in how to protect themselves from those hazards as evidenced by the lack of appropriate personal protective equipement being worn when using a solution of sodium hypochlorite, a corrosive material.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1904.32 A04
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $700.00 · Current $315.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.32(a)(4): The employer did not post an OSHA 300A Form or equivalent by February 1 thru April 30. At the Facility - On or about 3/5/13, the employer had not posted the annual summary of work-related injuries and illnesses.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $315
- — Z (O) $700
1910.134 C02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2): The employer did not develop and implement a respiratory protection program in accordance with sections i and ii of this paragraph (c)(2) for employees who chose to wear respirators where respirator use was not required: At the Facility - The employer did not develop nor implement a respiratory program for those employees who chose to wear half face cartridge respirators.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 325411)
VASSAR, MI—2026-07-14
VASSER WELLNESS AND VITALITY LLC DBA MUHA MEDS
BARCELONETA, PR—2026-07-02
PUERTO RICO ALCHEMY LLC
EDMORE, MI—2026-06-04
BLAZE PROCESSING
NEW BERLIN, WI—2026-06-03
DREAMPAK, LLC
REDMOND, OR—2026-05-27
317744311 - OREGON'S WILD HARVEST INC
More inspections in ME
AUGUSTA, ME—2026-07-14
JJ GONZALEZ ROOFING AND GUTTERS
DOVER FOXCROFT, ME—2026-07-14
REDI-ROCK OF CENTRAL MAINE
PORTLAND, ME—2026-07-06
NEW ENGLAND REHABILITATION HOSPITAL OF PORTLAND
DOVER FOXCROFT, ME—2026-07-06
SHAW'S SUPERMARKETS
GORHAM, ME—2026-07-02
TOWN OF GORHAM
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338935521.