Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

WHITE SETTLEMENT, TX —

OSHA Inspection: WHITE SETTLEMENT NURSING CENTER L.L.C.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

At a glance

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of WHITE SETTLEMENT NURSING CENTER L.L.C. in 7820 SKYLINE PARK DRIVE, WHITE SETTLEMENT, TX 76108 (NAICS 623110). OSHA activity number 338959018.

Watch White Settlement Nursing Center L.L.C. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for White Settlement Nursing Center L.L.C. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.

Where did this inspection happen?

Establishment
WHITE SETTLEMENT NURSING CENTER L.L.C.
Site address
7820 SKYLINE PARK DRIVE
City
WHITE SETTLEMENT
State
TX
ZIP
76108
Mailing
7820 SKYLINE PARK DRIVE, WHITE SETTLEMENT, TX 76108

What kind of inspection was it?

Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B

When did the case open and close?

Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded

Establishment context

NAICS code
623110
Employees
95
Ownership type
A

Citations

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.151 C

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 13 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4250.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use.     A.      On or about March 18, 2013, in the Laundry Department where alkaline detergents were used, the design of a faucet mounted eyewash was such that it was not single motion activated for immediate use.  It was plumbed into a common line so that hot or cold water could be accessed.  This condition resulted in a delay in activation and in eye contact with hot water.    B.      On or about March 18, 2013, in the Kitchen, where alkaline detergents were used, the design of a faucet mounted eyewash was such that it was not single motion activated for immediate use.  This condition resulted in a delay in activation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4250

1910.305 B01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2890.00 · Current $1734.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed.      On or about March 15, 2013, in the Kitchen, the cabinet that contained the electrical installation for a Badger Fire Suppression System was missing a knock-out plug.  Employees were exposed to fire and electrical contact hazards as a result of this condition.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1734
  • — Z (S) $2890

1910.333 B02 III C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4250.00 · Current $2125.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.333(b)(2)(iii)(C): Where a lock could not be applied, the employer could not demonstrate that tagging procedures would provide a level of safety equivalent to that obtained by the use of a lock in order to use a tag without a lock.   On or about March 15, 2013, in the west residential hallway near the dining area, a wall mounted panel was not capable of being isolated with a lock during maintenance activities.  No hasp was installed to accommodate the attachment of a lock.  Employees were exposed to an electric shock hazard should the tag be defeated by persons such as employees, residents, or the general public.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2125
  • — Z (S) $4250

1910.1030 D04 IV B

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3400.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(4)(iv)(B): The employer did not ensure that employees who had contact with contaminated laundry wore protective gloves and other appropriate personal protective equipment.   On or about March 15, 2013, employees who worked in the Laundry Department were potentially exposed to contact with blood or other potentially infectious material (OPIM).  Utility gloves were not available for employee use when handling laundry that might be contaminated with blood or OPIM.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3400

1910.1030 C01 II B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 52 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $1020.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(ii)(B): The employer's Exposure Control Plan did not include the schedule and methods of implementation for 29 CFR 1910.1030(d) methods of compliance:    On or about March 15, 2013, employees were potentially exposed to contact with blood or other infectious materials (OPIM).  The written program did not specify the type of bag to be used for compliance with 29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(4)(iv)(A)(2) where yellow bags and also biodegradable "sugar" bags were used as an alternative to the standard color coding in accordance with  paragraph (g)(1)(i) to contain contaminated laundry.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $1020
  • — Z (S) $0

More inspections in this industry (NAICS 623110)

More inspections in TX

Source

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338959018.