Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: ALTERNATIVE MANUFACTURING INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ALTERNATIVE MANUFACTURING INC. in 30 SUMMER STREET SUITE B, WINTHROP, ME 04364 (NAICS 334412). OSHA activity number 338973837.

Watch Alternative Manufacturing INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Alternative Manufacturing INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
30 SUMMER STREET SUITE B
City
WINTHROP
State
ME
ZIP
04364
Mailing
30 SUMMER STREET SUITE B, WINTHROP, ME 04364
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
334412
Employees
56
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 II D

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3500.00 · Current $1750.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(D): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the requirements for testing a machine or equipment to determine and verify the effectiveness of lockout devices, tagout devices, and other energy control measures:   Machine Area - The energy control procedures for the Juki KE-760L and the Juki 2050 provided generic procedures, rather than specific procedures, for verifying the effectiveness of lockout devices, tagout devices, and dissipating pneumatic energy.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1750
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.147 C06 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(ii): The employer did not certify that periodic inspections of the energy control procedures had been performed:   Establishment - The last certification of a periodic inspection of the energy control procedures was May 10, 2011.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.157 G01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 56 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2100.00 · Current $1050.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(1): An educational program was not provided for all employees to familiarize them with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting:   Establishment - An educational program was not provided for all employees to familiarize them with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1050
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4900.00 · Current $2450.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:  Machine Area, Universal Instruments Corporation VCD 1 Machine - The VCD 1 operator periodically uses a key to bypass the safety guard interlock and reach into the point of operation to remove electronic components during upset conditions.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2450
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.332 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3500.00 · Current $1750.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.332(b)(1): Employees were not trained in and familiar with the safety-related work practices required by 1910.331 through 1910.335 that pertained to their respective job assignments:  Establishment - Employees exposed to the hazards of electrical shock and electrical arc flash were not trained in the selection, inspection and use of electrical protective equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1750
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.335 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1): Employees working in areas where there are potential electrical hazards were not provided with, and did not use, electrical protective equipment that is appropriate for the specific parts of the body to be protected and for the work to be performed:  Establishment - Employees were not provided, and did not use, electrical protective equipment while conducting contact voltage testing for the absence of voltage and while conducting contact voltage testing on 120 volt live electrical parts.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.333 B02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3500.00 · Current $1750.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.333(b)(2)(i): The employer did not make a written copy of the procedures outlined in paragraph (b)(2) of 29 CFR 1910.333 available for inspection by employees and by the Assistant Secretary of Labor and his or her authorized representatives:   Establishment - The employer did not maintain a written procedure for working on or near exposed deenergized electrical parts.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1750
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.333 B02 IV B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.333(b)(2)(iv)(B): Before circuits or equipment was worked as deenergized, a qualified person did not use test equipment to test the circuit elements and electrical parts of equipment to which employees would be exposed to verify that they were deenergized:   Establishment - Not all personnel used test equipment to verify the absence of voltage before electrical circuits or equipment greater than 50 volts was worked as deenergized.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L04 III

Repeat 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $140.00 · Current $70.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not conducted at least once every three years:   Shipping Department - A lift truck operator was last evaluated on October 16, 2009.    Alternative Manufacturing, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard, which was contained in OSHA inspection number 313790735, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on October 29, 2009, with respect to a workplace located at 30 Summer Street, Suite B, Winthrop, Maine.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $70
  • — Z (R) $140

View ALTERNATIVE MANUFACTURING INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338973837.