2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17
Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025

OSHA Inspection: PEPSI COLA BOTTLING COMPANY OF BRISTOL

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PEPSI COLA BOTTLING COMPANY OF BRISTOL in 110 CORPORATE DRIVE, SOUTHINGTON, CT 06489 (NAICS 424490). OSHA activity number 338974553.

Watch Pepsi Cola Bottling Company OF Bristol — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Pepsi Cola Bottling Company OF Bristol is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
110 CORPORATE DRIVE
City
SOUTHINGTON
State
CT
ZIP
06489
Mailing
110 CORPORATE DRIVE, SOUTHINGTON, CT 06489
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
424490
Employees
51
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 A06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $3825.00 · Current $2678.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(6): The employer did not ensure that all nameplates or markings were maintained in a legible condition:    Storage Warehouse:  On or abour March 26, 2013, the data plate on the Hyster #1 battery powered forklift, S/N was illegible, in that it had been obscured by grease.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2677.5
  • — Z (S) $3825

1910.178 L04 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not conducted at least once every three years:   On or about March 26, 2013:  The performance of eight powered industrial truck operators had not been re-evaluated within three years.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 30 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3060.00 · Current $2142.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:   A.  Warehouse, on or about March 26, 2013, the employer had developed a written hazard communication program for employees exposed to chemicals including, but not limited to:  Potassium hydroxide and ethylene glycol monobutyl ether (Meyer XL-SC cleaning solution) and to sulfuric acid (battery electrolyte).  The program was observed to have the following deficiencies:  1.  The written hazard communication program did not include a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present, using an identity that was referenced on the appropriate material safety data sheet.  2.  The written hazard communication program did not include the methods the employer will use to inform employees of the hazards of non-routine tasks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2142
  • — Z (S) $3060

1910.147 C04 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:  Warehouse:  On or about March 26, 2013, the lockout/tagout program deveoped by the employer did not include written machine specific procedures for each type of multi-energy source equipment, including, but not limited to the air compressor and cardboard baler.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338974553.