OSHA Inspection: JERRY CLARK

Issued

2013-05-20 00:00:00

Abate by

2013-06-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $1600.00 · Current $1600.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1):   The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:  Employees conducting roofing activities were exposed to fall hazards of approximately eight feet and the employer had not developed and implemented an accident prevention program.

Issued

2013-05-20 00:00:00

Abate by

2013-06-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2):   The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s):   Employees conducting roofing activities were exposed to fall hazards of approximately eight feet and the employer had not inspected the work area or provided a substitute to inspect the job site in the absence of his usual competent person to ensure that the job site was free of recognized hazards.

Issued

2013-05-20 00:00:00

Abate by

2013-06-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1):   Employees were permitted to work in proximity to electric power circuits and were not protected against electric shock by de-energizing and grounding the circuits or effectively guarding the circuits by insulation or other means:   Employees conducting roofing activities were exposed to electrical hazards because they were working in close proximity to an energized power line and were not protected.

Issued

2013-05-20 00:00:00

Abate by

2013-06-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.416(a)(3):   Before work began, the employer did not ascertain by inquiry, direct observation, or by instruments, whether any part of an energized electric power circuit, exposed or concealed, was so located that the performance of the work could bring any person, tool, or machine into physical or electrical contact with the electric power circuit:   Employees conducting roofing activities were exposed to electrical hazards and the employer did not ensure that employees working in close proximity to an energized weatherhead were protected.

Issued

2013-05-20 00:00:00

Abate by

2013-06-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2400.00 · Current $2400.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10):   Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system.  Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system:  Employees conducting roofing activities were exposed to fall hazards of approximately eight feet and fall protection was not utilized.

Issued

2013-05-20 00:00:00

Abate by

2013-06-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):   The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:   Employees conducting roofing activities were exposed to fall hazards of approximately eight feet and were not able to recognize the fall hazards associated with the work because fall protection was not utilized.