Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: KAR KRAFT SYSTEMS, LLC

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of KAR KRAFT SYSTEMS, LLC in 20 PRIVILEGE STREET, WOONSOCKET, RI 02895 (NAICS 325612). OSHA activity number 338997596.

Watch KAR Kraft Systems, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for KAR Kraft Systems, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
20 PRIVILEGE STREET
City
WOONSOCKET
State
RI
ZIP
02895
Mailing
20 PRIVILEGE STREET, WOONSOCKET, RI 02895
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
325612
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D02

Serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $918.00 · Current $918.00
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:    Faciltiy: The employer did not verify that the required workplace assesment had been performed with a written certification, identifying the workplace evalutated, the hazard assessment, and a certification of the hazard assessment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $918
  • — Z (S) $918

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:  Workplace: An employee filling smaller containers from a larger capacity tote of caustic automotive liquid wore no protective goggles or chemically-resistant apron to protect against splashes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L01 II

Other-than-serious 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $918.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): Prior to permitting an employee to operate a powered industrial truck (except for training purposes), the employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by this paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5):    Facility: Then employees were using powered industrial trucks to move containers of hazardous chemicals, the employer did not ensure the employees had successfully completed the required training outlined in 29 CFR 1910.178(l)(3)(i) through (iii).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $918

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $918.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employers did not develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, material safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also includes the following:    (i): A list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present using an identity that is referenced on the appropriate material safety data sheet (the list may be compiled for the workplace as a whole or for individual work areas); and,    (ii): The methods the employer will use to inform employees of the hazards of non-routine tasks (for example, the cleaning of reactor vessels), and the hazards associated with chemicals contained in unlabeled pipes in their work areas:    Facility: When employees handled, and were exposed to, hazardous automotive chemicals the employer did not develop and implement a written hazard communication program as and outlined and required in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $918

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338997596.