Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
3,913,242Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: GRUNDMAN FABRICATORS AND ERECTORS LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GRUNDMAN FABRICATORS AND ERECTORS LLC in 3030 BURRIS ROAD SUITE A, DAVIE, FL 33314 (NAICS 332321). OSHA activity number 339034118.

Watch Grundman Fabricators AND Erectors LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Grundman Fabricators AND Erectors LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3030 BURRIS ROAD SUITE A
City
DAVIE
State
FL
ZIP
33314
Mailing
3030 BURRIS ROAD SUITE A, DAVIE, FL 33314
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332321
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 P01

Serious Gravity 1 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $720.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1):  Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s):    On or about May 1, 2013, at the above addressed worksite.    a.  An employee was exposed to ergonomic and struck by hazards while driving a powered industrial truck (Caterpillar, Serial No. 1CM01108) that had its seat broken and lacked a seat belt.      b.  Employees were exposed to a struck by hazard while working near a powered industrial truck (Caterpillar, Serial No. 1CM01108) that had its back indicator lights not working.       c.  An employee was exposed to an ergonomic hazard while driving a powered industrial truck (Komatzu, Serial No. 102840A) that had its seat broken.      d.  Employees were exposed to a struck by hazard while working near a powered industrial truck (Komatzu, Serial No. 102840A) that had a non-functioning front light and its back indicator lights broken.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.212 A02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(2): Guard(s) on machine(s) were not affixed to the machine or secured elsewhere when attachment to the machine was not possible:     a. On or about May 16, 2013, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were exposed to a caught-by hazard while working with an ironworker (Scotchman, 65 Tons) which lacked a fixed guard on its point of operation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.213 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.213(c)(1): Circular handfed ripsaw(s) were not guarded by an automatically adjusting hood which completely enclosed that portion of the saw above the table and above the material being cut:      a. On or about May 28, 2013, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee was exposed to a caught-by hazard while  cutting plywood by using a table saw (Jet, Model no. 70851C) that lacked an adjusting hood.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.213 C02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.213(c)(2): Hand-fed circular ripsaw(s) were not furnished with a spreader to prevent material from squeezing the saw or being thrown back on the operator:     a. On or about May 28, 2013, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee was exposed to a struck-by hazard while cutting plywood by using a table saw (Jet, Model no. 70851C) that lacked a spreader.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.213 C03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.213(c)(3): Hand-fed ripsaw(s) did not have non kickback fingers or dogs so located as to oppose the thrust or tendency of the saw to pick up the material or to throw it back toward the operator:     a. On or about May 28, 2013, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee was exposed to a struck-by hazard while cutting plywood by using a table saw (Jet, Model no. 70851C) that lacked non kickback fingers or dogs.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.305 B01 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $720.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed:    a.  On or about May 16, 2013, at the above addressed worksite.  An employee was exposed to an electrical hazard while plugging equipment into an outlet box with an unused opening not closed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use:   a.  On or about May 16, 2013, at the spray painting area of the above addressed worksite.  The employer had not established and implemented a written respiratory program to address the required use of a half mask air purifying respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a.  On or about May 16, 2013, at the spray painting area of the above addressed worksite.  An employee that used chemicals for painting purposes (i.e. Paint, Red water reducible shopcoat, Delta Laboratories Inc.) was not provided with information and training, as evidenced by, among other conditions; employee lacked knowledge of location/availability of the company's hazard communication program; employee lacked knowledge of the purpose, location and availability of the required safety data sheets, etc.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339034118.