Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: POWER PACKAGING, AN EXEL COMPANY

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of POWER PACKAGING, AN EXEL COMPANY in 401 N. MAIN STREET, ROSENDALE, WI 54974 (NAICS 311421). OSHA activity number 339054942.

Watch Power Packaging, AN Exel Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Power Packaging, AN Exel Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
401 N. MAIN STREET
City
ROSENDALE
State
WI
ZIP
54974
Mailing
P.O. BOX 197, ROSENDALE, WI 54974
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311421
Employees
135
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $7000.00 · Current $3500.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:     (a)  The Hassia B packing machine did not have machine guarding near the lid stack splicer area where employees inspect the material, exposing employees to pinch points and ingoing nip points.     (b)  The Case Packer #4 machine did not have machine guarding on the end of the machine exposing employees to pinch points as a ram pushed boxes down a line.           ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3500
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.178 A06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(6): The employer did not ensure that all nameplates or markings were not maintained in a legible condition:  (a)  The employer did not ensure the nameplate on Forklift #3 remained in a legible condition       ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339054942.