2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17
Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025

OSHA Inspection: PETER GALATIS

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PETER GALATIS in 31 K STREET, HAMPTON, NH 03842 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339061624.

Watch Peter Galatis — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Peter Galatis is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
PETER GALATIS
Site address
31 K STREET
City
HAMPTON
State
NH
ZIP
03842
Mailing
88 BROADWAY STREET, CONCORD, NH 03301
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:   a.       Site- Employees working underneath a ladder jack scaffold were not protected from over head struck by hazards where head protection was not worn.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2000
  • — C (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:  a. Roof- Employees operating pneumatic nail guns were not protected from eye injuries where eye protection was not worn.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2000
  • — C (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.452 K05

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1926.452(k)(5): Scaffold platforms were bridged on to another:  a. Scaffold- Employees working from a ladder jack scaffold were not protected from a scaffold collapse hazard where two metal scaffold platforms were bridged over the same ladder jack and extension ladder.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2000
  • — C (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1053 B03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(3): Ladders were loaded beyond their manufacturer's rated capacity:  a. Scaffold- Employees were exposed to a scaffold collapse hazard where a Louisville aluminum extension ladder was loaded beyond its rated capacity.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B21

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(21): Employees were not grasping the ladder with at least one hand when progressing up and/or down the ladder:  a. Site- Employees carrying tools and building materials while ascending an extension ladder where exposed to a fall hazard where only one hand was available to grasp the ladder.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2000
  • — C (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.451 G01 I

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $14000.00 · Current $14000.00
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(i): Each employee on a boatswains' chair, catenary scaffold, float scaffold, needle beam scaffold, or ladder jack scaffold was not protected by a personal fall arrest system:  a. Scaffold- Employees working from a ladder jack scaffold were exposed to a fall of approximately 14 feet where personal fall arrest systems were not utilized.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (W) $14000
  • — C (W) $14000
  • — Z (W) $14000

1926.501 B13

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   a. Roof- Employees working from the roof were exposed to a fall of approximately 15 feet where fall protection was not utilized.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (W) $0
  • — C (W) $0
  • — Z (W) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339061624.