Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: JAIME MALDONADO

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JAIME MALDONADO in 8150 POINT MEADOWS DR., JACKSONVILLE, FL 32256 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 339071698.

Watch Jaime Maldonado — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Jaime Maldonado is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JAIME MALDONADO
Site address
8150 POINT MEADOWS DR.
City
JACKSONVILLE
State
FL
ZIP
32256
Mailing
7101 DUNELEAS ARC WAY, NORCROSS, GA 30093
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:  a.  On or about May 15, 2013, at the northeast side of building No. 5, one employee using an air nail gun to install truss braces was not wearing eye protection, exposing himself to being struck by flying debris or nails.      b.  On or about May 15, 2013, at the northwest side of building No. 5, one employee using an air nail gun to install truss braces was not wearing eye protection, exposing himself to being struck by flying debris or nails.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):  a.  On or about May 15, 2013, at the northeast side of building No. 5, one employee installing truss braces on a 4:12 pitch roof was not protected from a 14 feet fall hazard by the use of conventional fall protection system or alternative fall protection measures.       b.  On or about May 15, 2013, at the northwest and southwest side of building No. 5, two employees installing truss braces on a 4:12 pitch roof were not protected from a 10 feet fall hazard by the use of conventional fall protection system or alternative fall protection measures.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339071698.