CARY, IL —
OSHA Inspection: FOX VALLEY SYSTEMS, INC.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of FOX VALLEY SYSTEMS, INC. in 640 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE, CARY, IL 60013 (NAICS 325510). OSHA activity number 339072993.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FOX VALLEY SYSTEMS, INC.
- Site address
- 640 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE
- City
- CARY
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 60013
- Mailing
- 640 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE, CARY, IL 60013
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 325510
- Employees
- 23
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
14 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.23 A03
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $5000.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(a)(3): Every hatchway and chute floor opening shall be guarded by hinged cover(s) or railings: Inside Roof Access. On or about March 6, 2013, the hatchway opening for the fixed inside ladder used to access the roof was not equipped with standard railings , closed cover or equivalent protection to prevent employees from falling through the opening once on the roof, and when pulling tools and supplies up through the hatchway by rope cable while standing on the roof near the opening. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (3)
- — F (W) $5000
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.27 D03
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.27(d)(3): The employer did not ensure that the side rails of a through ladder extended 3 1/2 feet above parapets and landings, omitting the rungs from the extension and having not less than 18 nor more than 24 inches clearance between the rails. Inside roof access. On or about March 6, 2013, the fixed ladder used to access the roof through the open hatchway did not have side rails (or equivalent protection) that extended 3 1/2 feet above the roof landing level for employees to hold onto to prevent falls to the floor below when climbing from the ladder onto the roof. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $2800
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energization, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative: Entire Plant. On or about the weeks of February 25, 2013 and March 4, 2013, employees performed servicing and maintenance (including setup) on machines or equipment with multiple energy sources such as but not limited to conveyors, palletizers, de-palletizers, mixers, capper machine, tipper machine, compressors, injection molding machines, riveting machines, paper cutter and die cutter. The employer did not implement and maintain a lockout/tagout program consisting of specific energy control procedures, employee training and periodic inspections as follows: a) Procedures for the control of hazardous energy were not developed, documented and utilized by the employer. b) Training of "Authorized", "Affected" and "Other" employees was not conducted and certified by the employer. Employees authorized to perform lockout/tagout were not informed of and trained to control hazardous energy sources according to specific procedures. c) Periodic inspections of the energy control procedures were not conducted and certified by the employer at least annually to ensure that the procedures and requirements of the standard were being followed. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $2800
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.305 G01 IV C
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1200.00 · Current $5000.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(C): Flexible cords and cables were used where run through doorways, windows, or similar openings. Storage Shed. On or about the week of February 25, 2013, a 110v flexible cord was plugged into an outlet inside the storage shed run through the window of the shed and plugged into the battery of the scissor lift for charging. Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (3)
- — F (W) $5000
- — C (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $1200
1910.332 B01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.332(b)(1): Employees were not trained in and familiar with the safety-related work practices required by 1910.331 through 1910.335 that pertained to their respective job assignments: On or about the weeks of February 25, 2013 and June 17, 2013, unqualified employees performed voltage testing up to 460-480v on energized components inside machine electrical panels and on overhead lighting fixtures. Employees were not trained in and familiar with safety-related work practices such as the use of special precautionary techniques, personal protective equipment (PPE) and insulating and shielding materials. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 1903.19(d).
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $2800
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.332 B03
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.332(b)(3): Additional Requirements for Qualified Persons. Qualified persons (those permitted to work on or near exposed energized parts) were not, at a minimum, trained in and familiar with the following: (i) The skills and techniques necessary to distinguish exposed live parts from other parts of electric equipment. (ii) The skills and techniques necessary to determine the nominal voltage of exposed live parts, and (iii) The clearance distances specified in 1910.333(c) and the corresponding voltages to which the qualified person will be exposed. On or about the weeks of February 25, 2013 and June 17, 2013, unqualified employees performed voltage testing up to 460-480v on energized components inside machine electrical panels and on overhead lighting fixtures. Employees were not trained in and familiar with the additional requirements for qualified persons, as listed above. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 1903.19(d).
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.334 C01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.334(c)(1): Unqualified persons performed testing work on electric circuits or equipment. On or about the weeks of February 25, 2013 and June 17, 2013, unqualified employees performed voltage testing up to 460-480v on energized components inside machine electrical panels and on overhead lighting fixtures. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 1903.19(d). Abatement note: Qualified persons shall be capable of working safely on energized circuits and shall be familiar with the proper use of special precautionary techniques, personal protective equipment (PPE), insulating & shielding materials and insulated tools (see 1910.333(c)(2)).
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $2800
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.335 A01 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i): Employees working in areas where there were potential electrical hazards were not provided with electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the specific parts of the body that needed to be protected and for the work being performed: On or about the weeks of February 25, 2013 and June 17, 2013, employees who performed voltage testing on energized electrical components up to 460-480v inside machine electrical panels and on overhead lighting fixtures did not wear appropriate electrical protective equipment, including but not limited to the following, to protect against electrical shock and arc flash/blast injuries: a) Rubber insulating gloves with leather protectors. b) Arc-rated clothing such as arc-rated long-sleeve shirt and pants or arc-rated coverall c) Arc-rated flash suit hood or balaclava d) Hearing protection (canal inserts) Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 1903.19(d). Abatement Note: For compliance assistance, refer to NFPA 70E national consensus standard, Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace, 2012 Edition, www.NFPA.org.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $2800
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.335 A01 IV
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(iv): Employees exposed to the danger of head injury from electric shock or burns due to contact with exposed energized parts did not wear nonconductive head protection: On or about the weeks of February 25, 2013 and June 17, 2013, employees who performed voltage testing on energized electrical components up to 460-480v did not wear nonconductive head protection, such as hard hats with die-electric properties, to protect against electrical shock and arc flash/blast injuries. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 1903.19(c). Abatement Note: For compliance assistance, refer to NFPA 70E national consensus standard, Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace, 2012 Edition, www.NFPA.org.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.335 A01 V
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(v): Employees exposed to the danger of injury to the eyes or face from electric arcs or flashes or from flying objects resulting from electrical explosion did not wear protective equipment for the eyes or face: On or about the weeks of February 25, 2013 and June 17, 2013, employees who performed voltage testing on energized electrical components up to 460-480v did not wear an arc-rated face shield to protect the eyes and face from electric arcs or flashes or from flying debris. Abatement documentation is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 1903.19(d). Abatement note: For compliance assistance, refer to NFPA 70E national consensus standard, Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace, 2012 Edition, www.NFPA.org.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 F05
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1600.00 · Current $1600.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged, or marked with the identity and appropriate hazard warnings regarding the chemicals contained therein: a) Compressed Gas Storage Area. On or about March 6, 2013, three compressed gas cylinders with unknown contents were not labeled as to their contents and hazard warnings. The unlabeled compressed gas cylinders were stored together with other cylinders of flammable compressed gases labeled as containing LP Gas, Dimethyl Ether and Propane. b) Packaging Area, near Tipper Machine. On or about March 6, 2013, two plastic spray bottles containing unknown solvents were not labeled as to their contents and hazard warnings. Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1600
- — C (S) $1600
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.178 L02 II
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3200.00 · Current $1600.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace. On or about the weeks of February 25 and March 6, 2013, the employer had not conducted a performance evaluation (driving test) for each powered industrial truck operator at least once every three years. FOX VALLEY SYSTEMS WAS PREVIOUSLY CITED FOR A VIOLATION OF THIS OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARD OR ITS EQUIVALENT STANDARD 29 CFR 1910.178(l)(i), WHICH WAS CONTAINED IN OSHA INSPECTION NUMBER 312724610, CITATION NUMBER 01, ITEM NUMBER 001 AND WAS AFFIRMED AS A FINAL ORDER ON APRIL 30, 2009. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1600
- — C (R) $3200
- — Z (R) $3200
1910.178 A06
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(6): The employer did not ensure that all nameplates and markings were in place: Shipping Department. On or about the weeks of February 25, 2013 and March 4, 2013 employee(s) operated the Yale No. 6 powered industrial truck, which did not have a label identifying model and serial number, classification and capacity of the vehicle. Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.303 G01 II
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(ii): The required working space about electric equipment rated 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground, was used for storage: Maintenance Area. On or about March 6, 2013, working space in front of 480v electrical breaker panels for production room machinery was used for storage of boxes of materials such as oil and antifreeze. Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at FOX VALLEY SYSTEMS, INC.
CARY, IL—2013-03-06 00:00:00
FOX VALLEY SYSTEMS, INC.
CARY, IL—2009-03-27 00:00:00
FOX VALLEY SYSTEMS, INC.
CARY, IL—2005-12-09 00:00:00
FOX VALLEY SYSTEMS, INC.
CARY, IL—2004-10-04 00:00:00
FOX VALLEY SYSTEMS, INC.
CARY, IL—2004-10-04 00:00:00
FOX VALLEY SYSTEMS, INC.
View FOX VALLEY SYSTEMS, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 325510)
FRONT ROYAL, VA—2026-07-14
AXALTA COATING SYSTEMS, LLC
HEALDSBURG, CA—2026-07-08
RUPERT GIBBON & SPIDER, INC.
ROCKLEDGE, FL—2026-06-24
RICHARD'S PAINT MANUFACTURING CO
ROCHESTER, PA—2026-06-18
THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY
AUBURN, CA—2026-06-15
PRESERVA PRODUCTS LTD
More inspections in IL
DEERFIELD, IL—2026-07-16
JOHN BURNS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC
BANNOCKBURN, IL—2026-07-16
BUILDER SERVICES GROUP, INC. DBA CJ INSULATION
BANNOCKBURN, IL—2026-07-16
ROOFING H.P. LLC
HIGHLAND PARK, IL—2026-07-16
UNITED PLUMBING AND DRAIN, INC.
FRANKLIN PARK, IL—2026-07-16
B & M PLASTIC INC.
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339072993.