Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: WEST GULF MARINE INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of WEST GULF MARINE INC. in 6000 HARBORSIDE DRIVE, GALVESTON, TX 77554 (NAICS 336611). OSHA activity number 339077513.

Watch West Gulf Marine INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for West Gulf Marine INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
6000 HARBORSIDE DRIVE
City
GALVESTON
State
TX
ZIP
77554
Mailing
6000 HARBORSIDE DRIVE, GALVESTON, TX 77554
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336611
Employees
83
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.212 A03 IV D

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4900.00 · Current $4900.00
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(iv)(d): 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(iv)(d): One or more methods of machine guarding were not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the press brake area of operation (front and back) from hazards such as those created at the point of operation, and ingoing nip points :         In the ship yard, on May 21, 2013, guarding was not provided on a Pacific Press technologies 400 Ton press, Model K675-2016, Serial number A1770, exposing employees to struck by and amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $4900
  • — Z (S) $4900

1915.117 A

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4900.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1915.117(a): When ship gear was used to hoist materials onboard, a competent person did not determine that the gear was properly rigged, in safe condition, and not overloaded.       In the ship yard, on May 21, 2013, the employer did not ensure employees were competent to properly inspect, rig equipment and ensure equipment is not over loaded, exposing employees to struck-by hazards
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.95 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $700.00 · Current $490.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(1): The employer did not establish and maintain an audiometric testing program as provided by 29 CFR 1910.95(g) by making audiometric testing available to all employees whose exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels:      In the ship yard, on May 21, 2013, and at times prior thereto; the employer did not ensure employees received audiometric testing, exposing employees to potential hearing loss.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $490
  • — Z (O) $700

1910.134 D01 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $700.00 · Current $490.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminants chemical state and physical form:         In the ship yard, on May 21, 2013, and at times prior thereto; the employer did not conduct a hazard assessment to ensure the employees had the proper respirators and/ or filters for their respirators, exposing employees to unknown chemical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $490
  • — Z (O) $700

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $700.00 · Current $490.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:          In the ship yard, on May 21, 2013, and at times prior thereto; the employer did not ensure the employees had a medical evaluation, exposing employees to life threatening conditions.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $490
  • — Z (O) $700

1910.134 F

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $700.00 · Current $490.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(f): The employee was required to use a respirator without being fit tested with the same make, model, style and size of respirator that was to be used:        In the ship yard, on May 21, 2013, and at times prior thereto; the employer did not ensure that employees were fit tested before issuing respirators, exposing employees to inhalation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $490
  • — Z (O) $700

View WEST GULF MARINE INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339077513.