OSHA Inspection: FOLSOM DISTRIBUTION COMPANY

Issued

2013-08-06 00:00:00

Abate by

2013-08-30 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2100.00 · Current $2100.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    Employees were working with chemicals such as Mobil 15-30 Motor Oil and the employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g) and (h) will be met

Issued

2013-08-06 00:00:00

Abate by

2013-08-30 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1):  The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical in use:     Employees were working with chemicals such as Mobil 15-30 Motor Oil and the employer did not have a material safety data sheet for all of the chemicals used by employees.

Issued

2013-08-06 00:00:00

Abate by

2013-08-30 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(h): Employees were not provided effective information and training as specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) and (2) on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard was introduced into their work area:                             Employees were working with chemicals such as Mobil 15-30 Motor Oil and the employer had not provided effective information and training specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) and (2).

Issued

2013-08-06 00:00:00

Abate by

2013-08-12 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.22(d)(1): On every building or other structure, or part thereof, used for mercantile, business, industrial or storage purposes, the loads approved by the building official were not marked on plates of approved design and securely affixed in a conspicuous place in each space to which they relate.     Employees were exposed to structural collapse due to a loft over the mechanics officer was not marked to show the loads approved by a building official.