Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: CEDAR CREEK CONSTRUCTION, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CEDAR CREEK CONSTRUCTION, LLC in 39W510 MATHEWSON, GENEVA, IL 60134 (NAICS 236117). OSHA activity number 339108680.

Watch Cedar Creek Construction, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Cedar Creek Construction, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
39W510 MATHEWSON
City
GENEVA
State
IL
ZIP
60134
Mailing
201 5TH ST., PERU, IL 61354
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236117
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $1600.00
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l)   On or about June 10, 2013 an employee was not certified or trained to operate a rough terrain fork truck, exposing the employee to the hazards associated with operating a rough terrain fork truck.    Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m)  or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502:  On June 10, 2013 employees were not protected from a fall while framing a residential property, exposing employees to fall hazards between 11 and 20.8 feet above grade.  Instance 1.  Employees were exposed to a fall while installing the exterior roof sheeting.  Instance 2.  Employees were exposed to a fall while walking and working around an unguarded stairwell on the second floor.  Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.502 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.502(b)(1): The top edge height of the top rails, or equivalent guardrail system members, was not 42 inches (1.1 m) plus or minus 3 inches (8 cm) above the walking/working level:Note:  When employees are using stilts, the top edge height of the top rail, or equivalent member, shall be increased an amount equal to the height of the stilts.   On June 10, 2013 employees were exposed to a fall while working around a guardrail that did not meet the 42" top rail requirment.   Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339108680.