Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: BERNARDINO PINEDA

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of BERNARDINO PINEDA in 365 SAVIN AVENUE, WEST HAVEN, CT 06516 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339122244.

Watch Bernardino Pineda — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Bernardino Pineda is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
BERNARDINO PINEDA
Site address
365 SAVIN AVENUE
City
WEST HAVEN
State
CT
ZIP
06516
Mailing
994 CAMPBELL AVENUE 1ST FLOOR, WEST HAVEN, CT 06516
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.25 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $1200.00
29 CFR 1926.25(a): During the course of construction, alteration, or repairs,  debris was not kept cleared from work areas, passageways, and stairs, in and around buildings or other structures:  JOBSITE:  The construction debris, such as (but not limited to) broken pieces of lumber and old roofing material was scattered on the ground in and around the walking/working area.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $1600.00
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns:  JOBSITE:  The employees, walking/working on the ground underneath the overhead work were not protected by protective helmets from falling objects.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):  JOBSITE:  The employee, engaged in installing roof sheathing on the steep pitched (8 in 12 pitch) roof, was not protected from the hazard of falling between 20 feet 11 inches to 36 feet to the ground by guardrails, personal fall arrest system or other equivalent means.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  JOBSITE:  The employee, exposed to the hazard of falling while installing roofing sheathings on the steep pitched (8 in 12 pitch) roof was not provided with information and training to control or minimize such hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize hazards related to ladders and stairways:  JOBSITE:  The employees, using a fiberglass extension ladder to have access to an upper working level were not provided with information and training regarding the safe use and handling of the ladder.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder�s length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  JOBSITE:  The side rails of the fiberglass extension ladder, used by the employees as a means of access to the upper working deck did not extend at least 3 feet above the roof.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1053 B05 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladder(s) were not used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder was approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder (the distance along the ladder between the foot and the top support:  JOBSITE:  The horizontal distance from the vertical support to the base of the 40 foot fibeglass extension ladder which was used by the employees to access the upper working deck of a house to perform work was more than one fourth (1/4) of the working length of the ladder.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339122244.